Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;92(2):289–318. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12059

Table A1.

Stigma's Impact on Access, Quality, and Well-Being, Logistic Regression

Odds-Ratio p-Value 95% CI Pseudo R2 (n)
Access
 Any doctor visits in the last year 0.906 0.787 0.442 to 1.854 0.3218
(556)
 Clinic-based, usual source of care 1.220 0.475 0.705 to 2.112 0.1636
(557)
Quality
 Quality of care good, very good, or excellent 0.382 0.002 0.210 to 0.695 0.0981
(460)
 All medical needs met in the last year 0.435 0.002 0.258 to 0.731 0.1016
(557)
 All mental health needs met in the last year 0.477 0.012 0.267 to 0.852 0.1758
(554)
Well-being
 Health good, very good, or excellent 0.556 0.036 0.321 to 0.962 0.1644
(557)
 Health the same or improved in the last year 0.456 0.010 0.251 to 0.827 0.1335
(557)

Except for stigma, the data source is self-reported survey data collected from September 2009 to December 2010. The stigma code was derived from qualitative interviews conducted from May to September 2011.

Models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, gender, prestudy diagnosis of depression or chronic health condition, education, federal poverty level, employment status, any insurance, and a clinic-based usual source of care (except the usual source of care model).

“Fair or poor” is the referent category in the quality of care and general health measures. The look-back period was in the previous 12 months. Having physical or mental health needs met includes those who did not report having any needs in the previous 12 months and those who did have needs and reported that all needs were met. Quality of care was contingent on using care.

PCS-8 and MCS-8 are from the short-form Medical Outcomes Survey. Questions in this scale use a 2-week look-back period.