Table 5.
Ranking the top 10 cited articles related to electronic cigarette worldwide
| SCRa | Authors with year of publication | Title | Source title | Cited by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st |
Bullen et al. 2010 [36] |
Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: Randomised cross-over trial |
Tobacco Control |
103 |
| 2nd |
Etter and Bullen 2011 [39] |
Electronic cigarette: Users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy |
Addiction |
90 |
| 3rd |
Etter 2010 [6] |
Electronic cigarettes: A survey of users |
BMC Public Health |
71 |
| 4th |
Vansickel et al. 2010 [42] |
A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic “cigarettes”: Nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects |
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention |
68 |
| 5th |
Cahn and Siegel 2011 [37] |
Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? |
Journal of Public Health Policy |
67 |
| 6th |
Polosa et al. 2011 [5] |
Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: A prospective 6-month pilot study |
BMC Public Health |
64 |
| 7th |
Ayers et al. 2011 [35] |
Tracking the rise in popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes) using search query surveillance |
American Journal of Preventive Medicine |
57 |
| 8th |
Eissenberg et al. 2010 [38] |
Electronic nicotine delivery devices: Ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administration |
Tobacco Control |
52 |
| 9th |
Siegel et al. 2011 [40] |
Electronic cigarettes as a smoking-cessation tool: Results from an online survey |
American Journal of Preventive Medicine |
46 |
| 10th | Trtchounian et al. 2010 [41] | Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics. | Nicotine & tobacco research | 44 |
Abbreviation: SCR Standard Competition Ranking.
aEqual documents have the same ranking number, and then a gap is left in the ranking numbers.