Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 4;7:1–14. doi: 10.4137/JEN.S11381

Table 1.

Summary of statistical results.

Data set Statistic used df F or t value Sig. level Figure
CPP 1
FN439-Nic vs. aCSF-Nic Indep t-test 9 4.16 P < 0.01
HIP MMP-2 2A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,38 18.44 P < 0.001
Days 4,38 169.68 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,38 9.45 P < 0.005
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,39 20.92 P < 0.001
Days 4,39 129.02 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,39 8.17 P < 0.005
HIP MMP-3 2A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,38 Not sig.
Days 4,38 96.96 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,38 9.07 P < 0.005
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,41 Not sig.
Days 4,41 72.31 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,41 12.74 P < 0.001
HIP MMP-9 2A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,40 21.65 P < 0.001
Days 4,40 79.70 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,40 8.84 P < 0.005
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,45 22.47 P < 0.001
Days 4,45 12.04 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,45 6.85 P < 0.005
PFC MMP-2 3A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,26 14.26 P < 0.001
Days 4,26 170.67 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,26 12.50 P < 0.001
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,26 18.93 P < 0.001
Days 4,26 122.24 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,26 9.40 P < 0.005
PFC MMP-3 3A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,35 11.92 P < 0.001
Days 4,35 248.69 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,35 4.35 P < 0.01
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,38 20.65 P < 0.001
Days 4,38 198.07 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,38 4.48 P < 0.005
PFC MMP-9 3A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,38 Not sig.
Days 4,38 61.55 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,38 Not sig.
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,40 Not sig.
Days 4,40 232/48 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,40 8.36 P < 0.001
HIP cortactin 4A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,40 Not sig.
Days 4,40 8.60 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,40 11.43 P < 0.001
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,38 Not sig.
Days 4,38 9.59 P < 0.001
Grps × days 4,38 3.81 P < 0.02
PFC cortactin 5A
aCSF-PBS vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,35 Not sig.
Days 4,35 Not sig.
Grps × days 4,35 17.91 P < 0.001
aCSF-Nic vs. Naïve HCC 2 × 5 ANOVA
Groups 1,38 Not sig.
Days 4,38 Not sig.
Grps × days 4,38 25.28 P < 0.001
CPP: aCSF-Nic 6
Init. pref. vs. Post-cond. Paired t-test 4 5.75 P < 0.01
Init. pref. vs. Re-exp Paired t-test 4 8.65 P < 0.001
Post-cond. vs. Re-exp Paired t-test 4 5.32 P < 0.01
HIP Re-Exp. MMP-3 7A
aCSF-PBS vs. naïve HCC Indep t-test 10 7.75 P < 0.001
aCSF-Nic vs. naïve HCC Indep t-test 10 7.21 P < 0.001
PFC Re-Exp. MMP-3 8B
aCSF-PBS vs. naïve HCC Indep t-test 10 12.22 P < 0.001
aCSF-Nic vs. naïve HCC Indep t-test 10 11.89 P < 0.001

Abbreviations: aCSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid; ANOVA, analysis of variance; cond, conditioning; CPP, conditioned place preference; df, degrees of freedom; exp, exposure; grps, groups; HCC, home cage control; HIP, hippocampus; indep, independent; init, initial; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; Nic, nicotine; P, probability; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PFC, prefrontal cortex; sig, significance (or significant); vs., versus.