Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Dec;65(12):1991–1999. doi: 10.1002/acr.22079

Table 3.

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between dynamic foot function and foot pain in the men and women of the Framingham Foot Study (2002–2008), adjusted for age and weight.


Men Women

OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Generalized foot pain
 Supinated vs. normal 1.09 (0.87 – 1.37) 0.458 0.93 (0.78 – 1.10) 0.396
 Pronated vs. normal 1.28 (1.04 – 1.56) 0.018 1.15 (0.98 – 1.36) 0.089
Toe pain
 Supinated vs. normal 0.99 (0.72 – 1.37) 0.970 1.14 (0.92 – 1.4) 0.226
 Pronated vs. normal 1.30 (0.99 – 1.71) 0.063 0.97 (0.76 – 1.23) 0.780
Ball of foot pain
 Supinated vs. normal 0.86 (0.57 – 1.32) 0.494 1.06 (0.84 – 1.34) 0.613
 Pronated vs. normal 1.05 (0.74 – 1.49) 0.790 1.04 (0.82 – 1.32) 0.758
Forefoot pain
 Supinated vs. normal 0.89 (0.6 – 1.34) 0.579 0.90 (0.71 – 1.14) 0.382
 Pronated vs. normal 1.26 (0.9 – 1.78) 0.178 1.06 (0.84 – 1.32) 0.633
Arch pain
 Supinated vs. normal 1.28 (0.96 – 1.72) 0.095 1.03 (0.81 – 1.32) 0.800
 Pronated vs. normal 1.26 (0.94 – 1.67) 0.120 1.15 (0.91 – 1.45) 0.243
Heel pain
 Supinated vs. normal 1.18 (0.83 – 1.68) 0.349 0.90 (0.68 – 1.19) 0.460
 Pronated vs. normal 1.54 (1.04 – 2.27) 0.030 1.22 (0.96 – 1.55) 0.099
Hindfoot pain
 Supinated vs. normal 1.24 (0.89 – 1.74) 0.203 0.74 (0.55 – 1.00) 0.048
 Pronated vs. normal 1.29 (0.92 – 1.82) 0.140 0.88 (0.67 – 1.15) 0.341