Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2014 Apr 21;50(31):4130–4133. doi: 10.1039/c4cc00739e

Table 1.

Reaction discovery and optimization.a

graphic file with name nihms-599297-t0003.jpg

Entry [Au] (y%) 2a/3
(equiv)
Additive
(1.5 • y %)
Yield
(conversion)b
1 Ph3PAuNTf2(5) 2.0/1.5 \ 5% (70%)
2 BrettPhosAuNTf2(5) 2.0/1.5 \ 5% (89%)
3 Me-DalPhosAuCl (5) 2.0/1.5 NaBArF4 86% (>99%)
4 Mor-DalPhosAuCl (5) 2.0/1.5 NaBArF4 87% (>99%)
5 LlAuCl (5) 2.0/1.5 NaBArF4 88% (>99%)
6 LlAuCl (2) 1.5/1.3 NaBArF4 83%c (>99%)
7d L1AuCl (2) 1.5/1.3 NaBArF4 39% (70%)
8e L1AuCl (2) 1.5/1.3 NaBArF4 34% (80%)
a

A solution of 3 in DCE was introduced into the reaction in a septum-capped vial via a syringe pump at the rate of 0.1mL/h; the nominal final concentration of 1a was 0.05 M.

b

Estimated by 1H NMR using diethyl phthalate as the internal standard.

c

Isolated yield.

d

3 was added into the reaction in one portion at the beginning.

e

The reaction was run at the room temperature.

graphic file with name nihms-599297-t0004.jpg