Table 2. Spatial-temporal clusters of scrub typhus in Guangzhou city, China, 2006–2012.
Year | Cluster type* | Time | Location | No. Obs | No. Exp | RR | P |
2006 | 1 | 5/22–10/22 | Conghua, Zengcheng | 52 | 18 | 3.3 | <0.001 |
2 | 7/3–7/30 | Nansha, Panyu | 19 | 5 | 4.1 | <0.001 | |
3 | 6/5–9/24 | Huadu | 23 | 7 | 3.5 | <0.001 | |
2007 | 1 | 5/22–11/19 | Conghua, Zengcheng | 74 | 18 | 5.1 | <0.001 |
2 | 5/8–11/5 | Nansha, Panyu | 49 | 24 | 2.3 | 0.002 | |
3 | 5/8–10/22 | Huadu | 28 | 9 | 3.2 | <0.001 | |
2008 | 1 | 5/22–11/19 | Conghua, Zengcheng, | 124 | 28 | 6.0 | <0.001 |
2 | 5/8–11/5 | Nansha, Panyu | 90 | 35 | 3.0 | <0.001 | |
3 | 5/8–7/16 | Huadu | 18 | 6 | 3.2 | 0.036 | |
2009 | 1 | 5/22–11/5 | Conghua, Zengcheng | 165 | 32 | 7.1 | <0.001 |
2 | 5/22–9/10 | Nansha, Panyu | 82 | 26 | 3.6 | <0.001 | |
3 | 5/22–9/10 | Huadu | 32 | 11 | 3.0 | <0.001 | |
2010 | 1 | 5/22–11/19 | Conghua, Zengcheng | 161 | 36 | 5.8 | <0.001 |
2 | 5/22–7/16 | Nansha, Panyu | 91 | 15 | 7.4 | <0.001 | |
5/22–11/19 | Huadu | 50 | 19 | 2.9 | <0.001 | ||
2011 | 1 | 5/22–11/19 | Conghua, Zengcheng, | 234 | 42 | 8.2 | <0.001 |
2 | 6/5–8/13 | Nansha, Panyu | 90 | 20 | 5.1 | <0.001 | |
3 | 7/3–8/27 | Huadu | 34 | 8 | 4.8 | <0.001 | |
2012 | 1 | 5/22–11/5 | Conghua, Zengcheng | 408 | 75 | 7.6 | <0.001 |
2 | 5/8–6/18 | Nansha, Panyu | 105 | 23 | 4.9 | <0.001 | |
3 | 5/22–10/8 | Huadu | 123 | 36 | 3.7 | <0.001 | |
4 | 5/8–6/18 | Haizhu | 38 | 18 | 2.2 | 0.025 |
*1: Primary cluster; 2–4: Secondary cluster; No. Obs: number of observed cases; No. Exp: number of expected cases; RR: relative risk for the cluster compared with the rest of the city.