Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 8;58:10.3402/fnr.v58.22769. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v58.22769

Table 4.

Multiplicative increase/decrease in mass gain associated with 1 sd increase in component score (under-reporters)

Fat mass Lean mass


Boys Girls Boys Girls
Number of children in analysis Model 0 1,005 1,030 1,005 1,030
Model 1 806 820 806 820
Model 2 676 709 676 709
Component
Health aware Model 0 0.968 (0.953, 0.983) 0.975 (0.962, 0.988) 0.999 (0.996, 1.001) 0.998 (0.995, 1.001)
P <0.001 <0.001 0.370 0.252
Model 1 0.973 (0.955, 0.991) 0.979 (0.963, 0.994) 0.998 (0.995, 1.001) 1.001 (0.997, 1.004)
P 0.004 0.008 0.189 0.715
Model 2 0.971 (0.952, 0.990) 0.979 (0.962, 0.996) 0.997 (0.994, 1.001) 1.002 (0.998, 1.006)
P 0.003 0.015 0.109 0.387
Traditional Model 0 1.000 (0.984, 1.016) 0.988 (0.975, 1.001) 1.001 (0.998, 1.004) 1.000 (0.997, 1.003)
P 0.997 0.080 0.583 0.818
Model 1 1.000 (0.981, 1.019) 0.994 (0.979, 1.009) 1.002 (0.999, 1.005) 0.997 (0.994, 1.001)
P 0.993 0.432 0.259 0.119
Model 2 0.998 (0.978, 1.018) 0.994 (0.979, 1.010) 1.003 (0.999, 1.006) 0.998 (0.996, 1.005)
P 0.841 0.489 0.106 0.799
Packed lunch Model 0 0.994 (0.979, 1.011) 0.997 (0.983, 1.012) 0.990 (0.997, 1.002) 1.002 (0.999, 1.006)
P 0.499 0.719 0.698 0.194
Model 1 0.990 (0.972, 1.008) 0.999 (0.983, 1.016) 0.999 (0.996, 1.002) 1.001 (0.997, 1.005)
P 0.273 0.944 0.600 0.690
Model 2 0.987 (0.968, 1.007) 1.000 (0.983, 1.018) 0.999 (0.996, 1.002) 1.001 (0.996, 1.005)
P 0.199 0.996 0.484 0.799