Skip to main content
Case Reports in Genetics logoLink to Case Reports in Genetics
. 2014 Jun 22;2014:248561. doi: 10.1155/2014/248561

Concomitant Alpha- and Gamma-Sarcoglycan Deficiencies in a Turkish Boy with a Novel Deletion in the Alpha-Sarcoglycan Gene

Gulden Diniz 1,*, Hulya Tosun Yildirim 2, Sarenur Gokben 3, Gul Serdaroglu 3, Filiz Hazan 4, Kanay Yararbas 5,6, Ajlan Tukun 5,6,7
PMCID: PMC4090428  PMID: 25050186

Abstract

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2D (LGMD-2D) is caused by autosomal recessive defects in the alpha-sarcoglycan gene located on chromosome 17q21. In this study, we present a child with alpha-sarcoglycanopathy and describe a novel deletion in the alpha-sarcoglycan gene. A 5-year-old boy had a very high serum creatinine phosphokinase level, which was determined incidentally, and a negative molecular test for the dystrophin gene. Muscle biopsy showed dystrophic features. Immunohistochemistry showed that there was diminished expression of alpha- and gamma-sarcoglycans. DNA analysis revealed a novel 7 bp homozygous deletion in exon 3 of the alpha-sarcoglycan gene. His parents were consanguineous heterozygous carriers of the same deletion. We believe this is the first confirmed case of primary alpha-sarcoglycanopathy with a novel deletion in Turkey. In addition, this study demonstrated that both muscle biopsy and DNA analysis remain important methods for the differential diagnosis of muscular dystrophies because dystrophinopathies and sarcoglycanopathies are so similar.

1. Introduction

Limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2D (LGMD-2D) is an autosomal recessive muscular disease caused by genetic defects in sarcolemmal alpha sarcoglycan (α-SGC) glycoprotein. Alpha-SGC or adhalin, one of the four sarcoglycans (SGCs), is essential for membrane integrity during muscle contraction and provides a scaffold for important signaling molecules [13]. Alpha-SGC is encoded by the sarcoglycan alpha gene (SGCA) located on chromosome 17q21 [1, 4]. LGMD-2D predominantly affects proximal muscles around the scapular and the pelvic girdles. LGMD-2D has a very heterogeneous phenotype. The age of onset, rate of progression, and the severity of disease can vary between and also within affected families. The most clinically severe course is generally observed when the sarcolemmal α-SGC is totally absent whereas milder phenotypes are observed when residual proteins are present [14]. Interestingly, a mutation in any SGC gene can lead to a reduction or absence of the other SGCs [47]. It was previously reported that the SGCA gene must be evaluated first if there is a concomitant absence of α-SGC and gamma- (γ-) SGC [4].

The differential diagnosis for LGMD-2D includes Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (DMD/BMD) and it is impossible to reach a diagnosis on clinical grounds alone. Therefore, immunohistochemical staining of a muscle biopsy and molecular genetic analysis are mandatory for the correct diagnosis [3, 5, 8, 9]. In this report, the patient's genotype was a previously unknown 7 bp deletion in exon 3. This finding adds to the growing spectrum of mutations in the alpha-sarcoglycan gene. Finally, we also discuss important considerations in the differential diagnosis of the muscular dystrophies.

2. Case Report

A 5-year-old boy had second degree consanguineous parents from Turkey without an ancestral history of neuromuscular disorders. There were no complications during pregnancy, and antenatal signs of muscular disorders such as polyhydramnios and reduced fetal movements were not noted. Cognitive and motor development was normal. At the time of presentation, his previously undetected mild muscle weakness was predominantly proximal. Deep tendon reflexes were present and he had no contractures. He was walking normally but he had mild difficulty when climbing stairs and running. Pulmonary function tests were normal. His creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels were between 9000 and 15000 units per liter (normal < 250 U/L), and there were myopathic changes on electromyography. Because of the very high CPK level, muscular dystrophy was suspected and, after informed consent, samples were obtained for histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics testing.

A muscle biopsy specimen from the left gastrocnemius muscle of the patient was frozen in isopentane that was precooled to −160°C in liquid nitrogen. Cryosections were immunostained for dystrophin using a polyclonal antibody (Neomarkers), with a monoclonal spectrin antibody (Novocastra) as a control. A neonatal myosin heavy chain (Neonatal myosin, Novocastra) antibody was used for the identification of pathological immature myofibers. SGCs were detected with anti-α-, -β-, -δ-, and -γ-SGC antibodies (Novocastra).

Peripheral blood specimens were collected from the proband and parents. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using a commercial DNA extraction kit (QiaGen, USA) following the standard manufacturer's protocol. The concentration of sample DNA was determined by a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The exon regions and flanking short intronic sequences of the SGCA gene were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by direct sequencing of the PCR products (ABI, US) (NCBI Reference Sequence: NG_008889.1). Hitherto reported genetic abnormalities in LGMD-2D are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of α-SGC gene.

1
1
ATG
Met
GCT
Ala
GAG
Glu
ACA
Thr
CTC
Leu
TTC
Phe
TGG
Trp
ACT
Thr
CCT
Pro
CTC
Leu
CTC
Leu
GTG
Val
GTT
Val
CTC
Leu
CTG
Leu

46
16
GCA
Ala
GGG
Gly
CTG
Leu
GGG
Gly
GAC
Asp
ACC
Thr
GAG
Glu
GCC
Ala
CAG
Gln
CAG
Gln
ACC
Thr
ACG
Thr
CTA
Leu
CAC
His
CCA 
Pro#

91
31
CTT 
Leu#
GTG
Val
GGC
Gly
CGT 
Arg#
GTC
Val
TTT
Phe
GTG
Val
CAC
His
ACC
Thr
TTG
Leu
GAC
Asp
CAT
His
GAG
Glu
ACG
Thr
TTT
Phe

136
46
CTG
Leu
AGC
Ser
CTT
Leu
CCT
Pro
GAG
Glu
CAT
His
GTC
Val
GCT 
Ala#
GTC
Val
CCA
Pro
CCC
Pro
GCT
Ala
GTC
Val
CAC
His
ATC
Ile

181
61
ACC
Thr
TAC 
Tyr#
CAC
His
GCC
Ala
CAC
His
CTC
Leu
CAG
Gln
GGA 
Gly#
CAC
His
CCA
Pro
GAC
Asp
CTG
Leu
CCC
Pro
CGG 
Arg#
TGG
Trp

226
76
CTC
Leu
CGC 
Arg#
TAC
Tyr##
ACC
Thr##
CAG 
Gln##
CGC 
Arg#
AGC
Ser
CCC
Pro
CAC
His
CAC
His
CCT
Pro
GGC
Gly
TTC
Phe
CTC 
Leu#
TAC 
Tyr#

271
91
GGC 
Gly#
TCT
Ser
GCC 
Ala#
ACC
Thr
CCA
Pro
GAA
Glu
GAT 
Asp#
CGT 
Arg#
GGG
Gly
CTC
Leu
CAG
Gln
GTC
Val
ATT 
Ile#
GAG
Glu
GTC
Val

316
106
ACA
Thr
GCC
Ala
TAC
Tyr
AAT
Asn
CGG 
Arg#
GAC
Asp
AGC
Ser
TTT
Phe
GAT
Asp
ACC
Thr
ACT
Thr
CGG
Arg
CAG
Gln
AGG
Arg
CTG
Leu

361
121
GTG
Val
CTG
Leu
GAG
Glu
ATT 
Ile#
GGG
Gly
GAC
Asp
CCA
Pro
GAA
Glu
GGC
Gly
CCC
Pro
CTG
Leu
CTG
Leu
CCA
Pro
TAC
Tyr
CAA
Gln

406
136
GCC
Ala
GAG 
Glu#
TTC
Phe
CTG 
Leu#
GTG
Val
CGC 
Arg#
AGC
Ser
CAC
His
GAT
Asp
GCG
Ala
GAG
Glu
GAG
Glu
GTG
Val
CTG
Leu
CCC
Pro

451
151
TCA
Ser
ACA
Thr
CCT
Pro
GCC
Ala
AGC
Ser
CGC
Arg
TTC
Phe
CTC 
Leu#
TCA
Ser
GCC
Ala
TTG
Leu
GGG
Gly
GGA
Gly
CTC
Leu
TGG
Trp

496
166
GAG
Glu
CCC
Pro
GGA
Gly
GAG
Glu
CTT
Leu
CAG
Gln
CTG
Leu
CTC 
Leu#
AAC
Asn
GTC 
Val#
ACC
Thr
TCT
Ser
GCC
Ala
TTG
Leu
GAC
Asp

541
181
CGT 
Arg#
GGG
Gly
GGC
Gly
CGT
Arg
GTC
Val
CCC
Pro
CTT
Leu
CCC
Pro
ATT
Ile
GAG
Glu
GGC
Gly
CGA
Arg
AAA
Lys
GAA
Glu
GGG 
Gly#

586
196
GTA 
Val#
TAC
Tyr
ATT
Ile
AAG
Lys
GTG
Val
GGT
Gly
TCT
Ser
GCC
Ala
TCA
Ser
CCT 
Pro#
TTT
Phe
TCT
Ser
ACT 
Thr#
TGC
Cys
CTG
Leu

631
211
AAG
Lys
ATG
Met
GTG
Val
GCA
Ala
TCC 
Ser#
CCC
Pro
GAT
Asp
AGC
Ser
CAC
His
GCC
Ala
CGC 
Arg#
TGT
Cys
GCC
Ala
CAG 
Gln#
GGC
Gly

676
226
CAG
Gln
CCT 
Pro#
CCA 
Pro#
CTT
Leu
CTG
Leu
TCT
Ser
TGC 
Cys#
TAC
Tyr
GAC
Asp
ACC
Thr
TTG
Leu
GCA
Ala
CCC 
Pro#
CAC
His
TTC
Phe

721
241
CGC
Arg
GTT 
Val#
GAC
Asp
TGG
Trp
TGC
Cys
AAT
Asn
GTG 
Val#
ACC
Thr
CTG
Leu
GTG
Val
GAT
Asp
AAG
Lys
TCA
Ser
GTG
Val
CCG
Pro

766
256
GAG
Glu
CCT
Pro
GCA
Ala
GAT
Asp
GAG
Glu
GTG
Val
CCC 
Pro#
ACC
Thr
CCA
Pro
GGT
Gly
GAT
Asp
GGG
Gly
ATC
Ile
CTG
Leu
GAG
Glu

811
271
CAT
His
GAC 
Asp#
CCG
Pro
TTC
Phe
TTC
Phe
TGC
Cys
CCA
Pro
CCC
Pro
ACT
Thr
GAG
Glu
GCC
Ala
CCA
Pro
GAC
Asp
CGT 
Arg#
GAC
Asp

856
286
TTC
Phe
TTG
Leu
GTG
Val
GAT
Asp
GCT
Ala
CTG
Leu
GTC
Val
ACC
Thr
CTC
Leu
CTG
Leu
GTG
Val
CCC
Pro
CTG
Leu
CTG
Leu
GTG
Val

901
301
GCC
Ala
CTG
Leu
CTT
Leu
CTC
Leu
ACC
Thr
TTG
Leu
CTG
Leu
CTG
Leu
GCC
Ala
TAT
Tyr
GTC
Val
ATG 
Met#
TGC
Cys
TGC
Cys
CGG
Arg

946
316
CGG
Arg
GAG
Glu
GGA
Gly
AGG
Arg
CTG
Leu
AAG
Lys
AGA
Arg
GAC
Asp
CTG
Leu
GCT
Ala
ACC
Thr
TCC
Ser
GAC
Asp
ATC
Ile
CAG
Gln

991
331
ATG
Met
GTC
Val
CAC
His
CAC
His
TGC
Cys
ACC
Thr
ATC
Ile
CAC
His
GGG
Gly
AAC
Asn
ACA
Thr
GAG
Glu
GAG
Glu
CTG
Leu
CGG
Arg

1036
346
CAG
Gln
ATG
Met
GCG
Ala
GCC
Ala
AGC
Ser
CGC
Arg
GAG
Glu
GTG
Val
CCC
Pro
CGG
Arg
CCA
Pro
CTC
Leu
TCC
Ser
ACC
Thr
CTG
Leu

1081
361
CCC
Pro
ATG
Met
TTC
Phe
AAT
Asn
GTG
Val
CAC
His
ACA
Thr
GGT
Gly
GAG
Glu
CGG
Arg
CTG
Leu
CCT
Pro
CCC
Pro
CGC
Arg
GTG
Val

1126
376
GAC
Asp
AGC
Ser
GCC
Ala
CAG
Gln
GTG
Val
CCC
Pro
CTC
Leu
ATT
Ile
CTG
Leu
GAC
Asp
CAG
Gln
CAC
His
TGA
Ter

*Note the previously determined missense mutations marked with #. The present deletion was marked with ## and bold letters.

3. Results

The muscle biopsy showed dystrophic changes like contraction, regeneration (Figure 1), degeneration, necrosis, nuclear internalization, and fibrosis. In addition, many pathological immature myofibers were visualized using the neonatal myosin staining (Figure 2). Based on immunostaining, dystrophin and spectrin expressions were normal. Except for isolated deficient fibers, beta (β) sarcoglycan and delta (δ) sarcoglycan were present at normal levels, whereas α-SGC and γ-SGC were diffusely absent (Figure 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Differences in the size and shape of myofibers as well as regeneration (HEx 200).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immature pathological fibers visualized with anti-neonatal myosin antibody staining (DABx 100).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Diffuse absence of sarcolemmal α-SGC (a) and γ-SGC (d) expression and normal β-SGC (b) and δ-SGC (c) expression (DABx 200).

Based on analysis of the proband, we have identified a previously undetermined homozygous 7 bp deletion in exon 3 (Figure 4). A similar heterozygous deletion was found in both parents (Figures 5 and 6). Location of this deletion was also indicated in Table 1. In addition, there were no abnormalities in the dystrophin gene and the other sarcoglycan genes (SGCB, SGCD, and SGCG) in the patient and his parents.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Proband exon 3 homozygous del TACACCC site.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Maternal heterozygous del TACACCC site.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Paternal heterozygous del TACACCC site.

4. Discussion

Human SGCA cDNA from a human skeletal muscle library was isolated and sequenced in 1993. This gene consisted of 10 exons. The protein product of SGCA gene consisted of 387 amino acids with an extracellular N-terminus, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular C-terminus. Northern blot analysis showed that human adhalin mRNA was expressed at the highest levels in skeletal muscle. It was also expressed in cardiac muscle and in the lung, but at much lower levels. On the contrary, adhalin mRNA was not detected in the brain. It was also reported that the adhalin mRNA from cardiac muscle was shorter relative to skeletal muscle and that the base sequence encoding the transmembrane domain was absent. It is known that LGMD-2D primarily affects skeletal muscles while brain and peripheral nerve functions are largely preserved. Briefly, the less severe cardiac dysfunction and lack of mental retardation in patients with LGMD-2D may be explained by the lower expression of α-SGC in cardiac muscle and the absence of adhalin expression in the brain [1, 3, 10]. In the patient described in this report, we did not find clinical evidence of cardiac involvement, decreased intellectual capacity, or denervation (as demonstrated by electromyography). The course of the disease in this case suggests that this novel deletion may cause a milder phenotype of LGMD-2D despite the diffuse absence of α-SGC and γ-SGC.

Immunohistochemical analysis of sarcolemmal proteins in muscle biopsies like dystrophin, SGCs, merosin, and dysferlin is an important part of the diagnostic evaluation of patients with muscular dystrophy. Reduced or absent sarcolemmal expression of one of the 4 SGCs can be found in patients with any type of LGMDs and also in patients with dystrophinopathies. It has previously been suggested that different patterns of SGC expression could predict the primary genetic defect and that genetic analysis could be directed by these patterns [58]. However, Klinge et al. [9] reported that residual SGC expression could be highly variable and an accurate prediction of the genotype could not be achieved. Babameto-Laku et al. [4] also determined that the concomitant absence of α-SGC and γ-SGC expression was caused by defects in the SGCA gene. Therefore, they recommended using antibodies against all four SGCs for immunoanalysis of skeletal muscle sections. Similarly, a concomitant reduction in dystrophin and any of the SGCs may illustrate the importance of considering coexisting dystrophinopathies in patients with sarcoglycan-deficient LGMD [913]. For this reason, it is not easy to decide whether the disease is a dystrophinopathy with defective expressions of SGCs or a LGMD with defective expression of dystrophin. However, in the patient described in this report, dystrophinopathies, such as DMD and BMD, were ruled out because the expression of sarcolemmal dystrophin was diffusely present and molecular tests for dystrophin gene were normal.

At present, more than 70 mutations have been reported in the SGCA gene that cause changes in the α-SGC glycoprotein. Approximately a two-thirds of mutations are missense mutations that generate a complete protein with a single residue substitution, whereas other mutations like nucleotide replacements, duplications, deletions, or insertions produce truncated, incomplete, or anomalous proteins. Almost all missense mutations map to the extracellular domain which is a critical region for the organization of SGCs and their association with dystroglycan. Only a single missense mutation maps to the intracellular domain and causes LGMD-2D in homozygous cases. Similarly, two mutations caused by deletions generate a normal extracellular portion of α-SGC and truncated intracellular tails. At present, there is no data about the intracellular tail of the α-SGC protein and its function [1, 1014]. In the family described in this report, we discovered a novel deletion in the TACACCC site of exon 3 that would cause a frame-shift mutation. The past literature highlights that the prediction of pathological consequences associated with different mutations of SGCA gene is very complex. It is not clear whether this novel deletion generates a severe disease phenotype or whether it also has additional, undetermined consequences.

Patients with any of the LGMDs may be clinically indistinguishable from those with the primary dystrophinopathies. It is likely that the prevalence of LGMD is underestimated and a number of male patients are incorrectly diagnosed with DMD or BMD [13]. A definitive diagnosis rests on performing the appropriate immunohistochemical examination as well as doing a molecular analysis. A normal dystrophin staining pattern should be seen as well as an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance. In contrast, the patients with dystrophinopathies may show variable findings from a normal to a regional absence or a mosaic pattern of sarcolemmal staining with anti-SGCs antibodies which correspond to an abnormal organization of the cell-membrane-associated dystrophin glycoprotein complex. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a careful examination of the immunohistochemical staining as well as a genetic study in order to make the correct diagnosis.

In summary, this report describes a novel deletion that adds to the growing list of defects associated with LGMD-2D and further emphasizes the importance of systematic analysis of all related genes, instead of limiting the analysis to the one SGC gene that is hypothesized to be the cause of the abnormalities. In this study, we also highlight the complexity of staining patterns associated with sarcolemmal proteins and the importance of careful analysis of this staining pattern in order to narrow the differential diagnosis of muscular dystrophies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Sandonà D, Betto R. Sarcoglycanopathies: molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic prospects. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine. 2009;11:p. e28. doi: 10.1017/S1462399409001203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carrié A, Piccolo F, Leturcq F, et al. Mutational diversity and hot spots in the α-sarcoglycan gene in autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy (LGMD2D) Journal of Medical Genetics. 1997;34(6):470–475. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.6.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eymard B, Romero NB, Leturcq F, et al. Primary adhalinopathy (α-sarcoglycanopathy): clinical, pathologic, and genetic correlation in 20 patients with autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1227–1234. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.5.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Babameto-Laku A, Tabaku M, Tashko V, Cikuli M, Mokini V. The first case of primary alpha-sarcoglycanopathy identified in Albania, in two siblings with homozygous alpha-sarcoglycan mutation. Genetic Counseling. 2011;22(4):377–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dubowitz V, Sewry CA, Oldfors A. Muscle Biopsy: A Practical Approach. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Saunders; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Higuchi I, Kawai H, Umaki Y, et al. Different manners of sarcoglycan expression in genetically proven α-sarcoglycan deficiency and γ-sarcoglycan deficiency. Acta Neuropathologica. 1998;96(2):202–206. doi: 10.1007/s004010050882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moreira ES, Vainzof M, Suzuki OT, Pavanello RC, Zatz M, Passos-Bueno MR. Genotype-phenotype correlations in 35 Brazilian families with sarcoglycanopathies including the description of three novel mutations. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2003;40(2):p. E12. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.2.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pogue R, Anderson LVB, Pyle A, et al. Strategy for mutation analysis in the autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophies. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2001;11(1):80–87. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8966(00)00154-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klinge L, Dekomien G, Aboumousa A, et al. Sarcoglycanopathies: can muscle immunoanalysis predict the genotype? Neuromuscular Disorders. 2008;18(12):934–941. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Trabelsi M, Kavian N, Daoud F, et al. Revised spectrum of mutations in sarcoglycanopathies. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2008;16(7):793–803. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Quinlivan RM, Robb SA, Sewry C, Dubowitz V, Piccolo F, Kaplan JC. Absence of alpha-sarcoglycan and novel missense mutations in the alpha-sarcoglycan gene in a young British girl with muscular dystrophy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1997;39(11):770–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ávila De Salman S, Taratuto AL, Dekomien G, Carrero-Valenzuela R. Alpha vs. gamma sarcoglycanopathy: DNA tests solve a case from Argentina. Acta Myologica. 2007;26(2):115–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schara U, Gencik M, Mortier J, et al. Alpha-sarcoglycanopathy previously misdiagnosed as Duchenne muscular dystrophy: implications for current diagnostics and patient care. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2001;160(7):452–453. doi: 10.1007/s004310100744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Diniz G, Tosun Yildirim H, Akinci G, et al. Sarcolemmal alpha and gamma sarcoglycan protein deficiencies in Turkish siblings with a novel missense mutation in the alpha sarcoglycangene. Pediatric Neurology. 2014;50(6):640–647. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES