Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 10;4:5643. doi: 10.1038/srep05643

Table 3. Database Scan results using various fingerprints for Target Dataset.

    MSA SBA SSS OCR OCRS OCRMIN
Fold Class and Fold Type #Protein %res EFF %res EFF %res EFF %res EFF %res EFF %res EFF
All beta Proteins                          
GFP-like protein 273 23 33 18 44 19 98 10 99 7 100 7 100
Cupredoxin-like proteins 120 22 0 26 24 20 35 10 91 6 17 9 99
Acid Proteases 578 60 76 59 67 55 78 46 80 13 84 11 89
Ribosomal Protein L14 291 66 64 64 70 44 73 41 83 8 87 7 90
Alpha and beta (α + β) Proteins                          
β-Grasp (Ubiquitin-like) protein 400 45 58 45 62 31 70 27 75 12 90 12 90
Nucleoside Triphosphate Hydrolase 530 33 34 26 47 18 57 14 91 10 93 9 94
RNAase A-like proteins 319 45 83 42 81 33 88 31 93 17 98 15 98
Cysteine Proteinases 198 39 33 39 34 37 40 33 61 6 86 6 90
Alpha and beta (α/β) Proteins                          
50 S Ribosomal Protein L25 111 52 86 47 88 26 88 14 97 6 35 14 97
50 S Ribosomal Protein L6P 317 47 57 45 62 36 74 28 81 12 89 12 98
Difydrofolate reductase-like proteins 272 38 56 38 57 33 67 25 67 13 91 12 96
Pyruvate kinase N-terminal domain 65 57 48 54 60 49 14 44 48 17 94 16 100

Here, table lists the percentage of the sequence residues involved in the generated fingerprints as well as the fold detection efficiencies of the respective fingerprints for the target dataset. Here, #Protein, %res and EFF indicates the total number of structural homologs the PDB, percentage of the conserved positions used to generate each fingerprints, and the fold detection efficiency, respectively.