Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2013 Oct 16;26(3):253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2013.10.005

Table 1.

Selected randomized trials in relapsed/refractory AML.

Treatment N 2nd CR, % Median
duration 2nd
CR, mo
Median
OS, mo
HDAra-C vs HDAra-C +Mit 162 32 vs 44 9 vs 5 8 vs 6
EMA vs EMA + GM-CSF 72 81 vs 89 4 vs 5 9 vs 10
MAE vs MAE + G-CSF 129 25 vs 17 9 vs 10 5 vs 4
MEC vs MEC + lintuzumab 191 23 vs 29 NA 8 vs 6
HDAra-C vs HDAra-C + laromustine 178 19 vs 35 332 vs 275 d 177 vs 128 d
HDAra-C + Mit vs IDAC + Mit 186 52 vs 45 5.3 vs 3.3 5 vs NA
HDAra-C + Amsa vs HDAra-C + Mit 52 53 vs 60 11 vs 12 8 vs 11
HDAra-C vs HDAra-C + Amsa 36 14 vs 53 NA 2 vs 6
HDAra-C vs HDAra-C + Eto 131 40 vs 45 12 vs 25 5 vs 5

Karanes, et al. Leuk Res. 1999;23:787–794; Thomas, et al. Leukemia. 1999; 13: 1214–1220; Greenberg, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22: 1078–1086; Feldman, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4110–4116; Giles, et al. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2006; 108. Abstract 1970; Kern, et al. Leukemia. 2000; 14:226–231; Martiat, et al. Eur J Haematol. 1990;45: 164–167; Larson, et al. Br J Haematol. 1992;82:337–346; Vogler, et al. Leukemia. 1994;8: 1847–1853; Ohno, et al. Blood. 1994;83:2086–2092