Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 3;111(1):1–7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.144

Table 3. Primary and secondary outcomes for the DCIS cohort (Unadjusted results shown).

Outcome DA mean (s.d.) Control mean (s.d.) Difference (95% CI) P-value Standardised effect
Decisional conflict (DCS; max 100)
20.7 (25.4)
11.9 (10.9)
8.8 (−2.4, 20.0)
0.1
0.42
Knowledge of clinical trials (max 7)
5.56 (1.4)
5.14 (1.8)
0.41 (−0.52, 1.35)a
0.3
0.26
Objective knowledge of IBIS-II (max 100)
77.6 (16.5)
63.8 (22.2)
13.9 (3.7, 24.0)a,b
0.008
0.69
Subjective knowledge of IBIS-II (QuIC-B; max 100)
88.9 (12.5)
83.2 (25.6)
5.7 (−3.3, 14.6)a
0.2
0.29
Anxiety (STAI-S; max 80)
29.6 (8.7)
36.7 (10.9)
−7.1 (−14.7, 0.6)b
0.07
−0.70
Attitude towards IBIS-II (max 100)
76.0 (15.3)
83.2 (11.8)
−7.1 (−17.2, 2.9)
0.2
−0.51
Decisional regret at 3 months (DRS; max 50)
16.9 (17.4)
20.5 (12.1)
−3.5 (−14.6, 7.4)
0.5
−0.24
Decisional satisfaction at 3 months (SWD; max 5)
4.40 (0.7)
4.39 (0.4)
0.01 (−0.41, 0.41)
1.0
0.01
Intended to participate in IBIS-II
65%
73%
−9 (−41, 23)
0.6
−0.09
Actual enrolment in IBIS-II
58%
64%
−6 (−40, 27)
0.7
−0.13
Dropout from IBIS-IIc 4/11=36% 2/9=22% 14 (−25, 53)b 0.4 0.30

Abbreviations: CI= confidence interval; DCS= decisional conflict scale; DRS= Decisional Regret Scale; IBIS-II= International Breast Cancer Intervention Study-II; QuIC-B= Quality of Informed Consent scale – Part B; STAI-S= State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state scale; SWD= Satisfaction with Decision scale.

a

P<0.05 for main effect of cohort, indicating a difference in levels between Prevention and DCIS cohorts.

b

P<0.05 for main effect of cohort x group, indicating a difference in intervention effect between Prevention and DCIS cohorts.

c

Among those who enrolled.