Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub3
Methods Trial of “Significant Other Supporter” (SOS) program, of bolstered social support and direct financial rewards, for low-income high-risk women in 4 Oregon WIC program sites, US. Conducted between June 1996 and June 1997
Participants Women smoking (even a puff in the last 7 days); less than 28 weeks’ gestation; over 15 years of age; literate in English. Participation rate 71%. Mean salivary cotinine at baseline: I: 45.4 (n = 112);
C: 45.7 (n = 108).
Interventions Control group received verbal and written information on the importance of smoking cessation, a pregnancy specific smoking cessation self-help kit, and were telephoned monthly for self-reports on their smoking status.
The intervention group received as for the control group plus were asked to designate a social supporter (preferably a female non-smoker), and were advised both she and her supporter would receive an incentive: participants were given $50 voucher for each month biochemically confirmed as quit. Supporter received $50 voucher in first month and at 2 months postpartum, and $25 voucher for other months. The intervention was delivered by trained program staff or research staff. Theoretical basis: rewards and social support. Intensity rating: I = 4, C = 3
Outcomes Smoking cessation biochemically validated with salivary cotinine at 34 weeks’ gestation and 2 months postpartum
Notes Data in outcome tables is inconsistent.
Risk of bias
Item Authors’ judgement Description
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear No information provided.
Allocation concealment? Unclear No information provided.
Blinding?
Women and clinical staff
No Neither providers nor women were blinded for this educational intervention with incentives
Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
Unclear High attrition rates I = 32%; C = 51.5%, but drop-outs included as smokers in this analysis. Those lost to follow up were considered to be smokers
Free of selective reporting? Yes Main outcomes reported.
Free of detection bias? Yes Reported quitting validated by salivary cotinine analysis.