Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 9;4(7):e004998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004998

Table 3.

Proportional hazards model for fever

Variable HR (95% CI) p Value
Model 1
Age 1.02 (1.00 to 1.04) 0.11
Sex (F vs M) 0.93 (0.65 to 1.34) 0.71
Activities of daily living (wheelchair users or bedridden vs ambulatory) 1.88 (1.27 to 2.78) <0.01
Cognition (moderate-to-severe vs none-to-mild) 1.69 (1.12 to 2.57) 0.01
Gastrostoma 1.49 (0.81 to 2.75) 0.20
Respirator 7.77 (2.42 to 24.97) <0.01
Domiciliary oxygen therapy 0.74 (0.34 to 1.63) 0.46
Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.10 (1.01 to 1.21) 0.03
N=419
Model 2
Age 1.03 (1.004 to 1.05) 0.02
Sex (F vs M) 1.03 (0.70 to 1.50) 0.88
Care-need level (≥3 vs ≤2) 4.49 (2.88 to 6.99) <0.01
Gastrostoma 1.32 (0.74 to 2.34) 0.35
Respirator 6.26 (2.95 to 13.29) <0.01
Domiciliary oxygen therapy 0.64 (0.29 to 1.44) 0.28
Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.11 (1.02 to 1.21) 0.01
  N=413*

*Care-need levels were not determined in six participants and thus data from 413 patients were analysed in model 2.

F, female; M, male.