Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):983–991. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1253

Table 3.

Clinical Significance of Main Outcomes at 4 Months

Control Group, No. (%)a
(n = 107)
Intervention Group, No. (%)a
(n = 102)
Difference in
Net
Improvement
(95% CI)
P
Value
Improved Worsened Net
Improvement
Improved Worsened Net
Improvement
Overall functional dependenceb 41 (39.8) 11 (10.7) 30 (29.3) 51 (51.5) 3 (3.0) 48 (48.5) 19.2 (2.7 to 36.0) .02
IADL dependenceb 52 (50.5) 7 (6.8) 45 (43.7) 64 (64.6) 3 (3.0) 61 (61.6) 17.9 (1.9 to 34.0) .03
Activity engagement 40 (37.4) 42 (39.3) −2 (−1.9) 44 (43.1) 31 (30.4) 13 (12.7) 14.6 (−8.8 to 38.0) .22
Perceived change in well-being 42 (39.3) 21 (19.6) 21 (19.6) 58 (56.9) 11 (10.8) 47 (46.1) 26.5 (7.2 to 45.8) .007
Confidence using activitiesc 29 (27.4) 24 (22.6) 5 (4.7) 41 (41.0) 10 (10.0) 31 (31.0) 26.3 (7.9 to 44.7) .005

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living.

a

Not shown are the numbers (%) of those who stayed the same.

b

This measure was assessed for 99 of 102 patients in the intervention group and 103 of 107 patients in the control group because 7 patients were placed in nursing homes and the caregivers were unable to assess functional dependence.

c

This measure was assessed for 106 caregivers in the control group.