Table 3.
|
All children |
Sons |
Daughters |
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Beta [95%CI] $ | N | Beta [95%CI] $ | N | Beta [95%CI] $ | P for heterogeneity* | |
Father: Model 1 |
423 |
0.09 [−0.01 to 0.19] |
227 |
0.10 [−0.02 to 0.22] |
196 |
0.07 [−0.04 to 0.19] |
0.757 |
Father: Model 2 |
423 |
0.09 [−0.01 to 0.18] |
227 |
0.09 [−0.03 to 0.21] |
196 |
0.07 [−0.04 to 0.18] |
0.764 |
Mother: Model 1 |
651 |
0.09 [0.03 to 0.17] |
337 |
0.06 [−0.06 to 0.18] |
314 |
0.15 [0.07 to 0.24] |
0.188 |
Mother: Model 2 | 651 | 0.10 [0.02 to 0.17] | 337 | 0.05 [−0.07 to 0.17] | 314 | 0.16 [0.07 to 0.25] | 0.173 |
$Beta coefficient for child MVPA minutes per minute of parent MVPA.
*Testing that associations are different between time spent in MVPA by daughters and by sons; tested by adding an interaction term (parent MVPA*child gender) into the regression model.
Model 1: Unadjusted association.
Model 2: Adjusted for parent’s age, parent’s BMI, and household IMD.