Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Rev. 2010 Feb;34(1):19–34. doi: 10.1177/0193841X09353534

Table 1.

HIV Risk Analysis: Estimated Risk of Acquiring HIV Based on Number of Individually Assessed Partners

Maximum # of Individually Assessed Partners
0 1 2 3 Alla
High-risk men (N = 160)
  Mean HIV risk × 1,000 0.9045 0.9013 0.9006 0.9003 0.8995
  Estimation error (%)b 0.55 0.20 0.12 0.10 0
High-risk women (N = 163)
  Mean HIV risk × 1,000 3.6191 3.4768 3.4636 3.4614 3.4603
  Estimation error (%) 4.59 0.48 0.09 0.03 0
Men who have sex with men (N =145)
  Mean HIV risk × 1,000 5.2187 4.8884 4.8524 4.8396 4.8113
  Estimation error (%) 8.47 1.61 0.86 0.59 0
Combined sample (N = 468)
  Mean HIV risk × 1,000 3.1866 3.0337 3.0176 3.0128 3.0034
  Estimation error (%) 6.10 1.01 0.47 0.31 0
a

Presumed “gold standard” to which other sexual behavior assessment strategies were compared.

b

Percentage error compared to “gold standard,” in which all partners are individually assessed. The estimation error for a simulated assessment strategy in which only m sex partners are assessed in detail equals (P (m) - P(M))/P(M), where P(m) is the risk estimate obtained for the simulated strategy and P(M) is the risk estimate obtained when all sexual partners are individually assessed. Larger mean errors indicate reduced accuracy in the HIV/STI risk estimates obtained for a particular assessment strategy.