Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2014 May 13;59(11):2829–2847. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/11/2829

Table 1.

Mean, peak variance, and dose for the images in Figure 5. The variance and dose are defined relative to the peak variance and dose for the abdomen scan with bowtie only. All non-ideal detectors operate at 5 * 106 s-1 mm-2. ∞ denotes analytically infinite variance, which occurs at the variance singularity in the paralyzable detector model.

Dataset Fluence Control PCXD Model Relative Mean Variance Relative Peak Variance Relative Dose
Thorax Bowtie + TCM Ideal 26% 79% 29%
Thorax Bowtie Only Ideal 28% 79% 24%
Thorax Dynamic Ideal 62% 79% 14%
Thorax Bowtie + TCM Nonparalyzable 37% 91% 29%
Thorax Bowtie Only Nonparalyzable 40% 92% 24%
Thorax Dynamic Nonparalyzable 76% 94% 14%
Thorax Bowtie + TCM Paralyzable 29%
Thorax Bowtie Only Paralyzable 24%
Thorax Dynamic Paralyzable 87% 104% 14%
Thorax Bowtie + TCM Hybrid 129% 239% 29%
Thorax Bowtie Only Hybrid 124% 256% 24%
Thorax Dynamic Hybrid 79% 95% 14%
Abdomen Bowtie + TCM Ideal 47% 100% 96%
Abdomen Bowtie Only Ideal 46% 100% 100%
Abdomen Dynamic Ideal 83% 100% 61%
Abdomen Bowtie + TCM Nonparalyzable 60% 113% 96%
Abdomen Bowtie Only Nonparalyzable 58% 113% 100%
Abdomen Dynamic Nonparalyzable 97% 114% 61%
Abdomen Bowtie + TCM Paralyzable 100%
Abdomen Bowtie Only Paralyzable 96%
Abdomen Dynamic Paralyzable 104% 120% 59%
Abdomen Bowtie + TCM Hybrid 77% 151% 96%
Abdomen Bowtie Only Hybrid 75% 160% 100%
Abdomen Dynamic Hybrid 99% 116% 61%