Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Nov 28;25(2):219–233. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00335

Table 1.

Relative Levels of Search, Strength Differences, and Retrieval Success Presented for Each of the Three Comparisons: Remembered versus Classify, Forgotten versus Classify, and Study Level

Remembered vs. Classify Forgotten vs. Classify Study Level
Search ++ vs. absent +++ vs. absent Some decrease with strength
Strength ++ vs. absent + vs. absent + vs. ++ vs. +++
Retrieval success +++ vs. absent Absent Equal

The overlap of all three comparisons involves varying degrees of search and strength. Search is engaged during remembered and forgotten recall trials, relative to a baseline classification task, and can be isolated from strength by excluding effects of study level. Differences in memory strength are highlighted by comparing successful recall of low-, medium-, and high-study word pairs, and effects of search can be minimized by excluding the forgotten-versus-classify contrast. +++ = high; ++ = medium; + = low.