Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e102257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102257

Table 2. The results modelled for the interaction of season with scavenger species richness and sum feeding time.

Scavenger Richness Sum Feeding Time
Model Variables df F p AIC df F p AIC
1 PUMA 1 2.12 0.1499 441.0 1 4.96 0.0280 201.8
2 SEAS 3 1.28 0.2860 443.6 3 1.65 0.1820 202.1
3 PUMA:SEAS 3 0.99 0.3982 447.5 3 1.61 0.1910 185.5
1 BEAR 1 7.01 0.0096 344.3 1 26.04 <0.0001 203.7
2 SEAS 3 5.02 0.0030 339.1 3 3.91 0.0114 240.7
3 BEAR:SEAS 3 2.20 0.0940 341.0 3 0.69 0.5631 193.9

The variables include pumas (puma kill vs. control), black bears (black bear present vs. absent), and the 4 seasons. The statistical significance and Akaike’s Information Criterion of each model is reported.

Model variables: PUMA = puma carcass type (puma kill or puma control carcass), SEAS = season of year (winter, spring, summer, or autumn), BEAR = black bear carcass type (carcasses where black bear is present or carcass where black bear is absent).