Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;26(12):1689–1697. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13190

Table 2.

Effect of physical form and urea treatment of rice straw on feed intake, nutrient intake and apparent nutrient digestibility of dairy steers

Item RS
UTRS
SEM Significance1
LFR CHR LFR CHR U P U×P
DM intake
Rice straw
  kg/d 3.6 3.6 4.5 4.6 0.10 ** ns ns
  g/kg BW0.75 59.6 59.5 72.4 75.3 2.34 * ns ns
Concentrate
  kg/d 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.04 ns ns ns
  g/kg BW0.75 19.5 20.4 19.6 19.3 0.15 ns ns ns
Total
  kg/d 4.7 4.9 5.7 5.7 0.11 * ns ns
  g/kg BW0.75 79.1 80.0 92.0 94.6 2.47 * ns ns
Nutrients intake (kg)
  Organic matter 3.9 4.2 5.0 5.1 0.07 ** ns ns
  Crude protein 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.01 ** ns ns
  Neutral detergent fiber 3.0 3.2 3.9 4.0 0.05 ** ns ns
  Acid detergent fiber 2.6 2.8 3.4 3.5 0.07 ** ns ns
Apparent digestibility (%)
  Dry matter 56.7 56.5 62.4 63.1 1.28 * ns ns
  Organic matter 61.7 61.5 67.3 67.6 1.13 * ns ns
  Crude protein 50.9 50.6 67.9 68.4 1.42 ** ns ns
  Neutral detergent fiber 55.8 60.0 65.7 64.7 1.02 * ns ns
  Acid detergent fiber 51.3 55.6 60.2 60.0 1.26 * ns ns
1

U = Untreated rice straw vs urea-treated (3%) rice straw, P = Long form rice straw vs chopped (4 cm) rice straw, U×P roughage source and physical form interaction.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01, ns = Non-significant (p>0.05).