Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;25(4):452–461. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11270

Table 5.

Effects of dietary treatment on allantoin excretion, purine derivative excretion, purine derivative absorption and microbial protein synthesis

Items Levels of MUP (g/hd/d) SEM

T1 T2 T3 T4
Allanoin excretion (mmol/d) 54.3a 92.1b 110.7c 137.7d 3.25
PD excretion (mmol/d)1 63.9a 108.4b 130.3c 162.0d 3.82
PD absorption (mmol/d)2 59.0a 111.3b 137.3c 174.4d 4.68
MNS (g N/d)3 42.9a 80.9b 99.8c 126.8d 3.40
MP (g/d)4 268.2a 505.4b 623.6c 792.2d 15.05
EMNS (g N/d of OMDR)5 12.6a 22.7b 26.1c 31.0d 0.90
a,b,c

Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (p<0.05).

1

Urinary purine derivative contained allanoin 80–85%.

2

Calculated from (PD excretion-0.147×BW0.75)/0.85.

3

MNS = Microbial nitrogen supply, calculated form (PD absorption×0.727) (Chen and Gomes, 1995).

4

MP = Microbial protein production, calculated from (MNS×6.25).

5

EMNS = Efficiency of microbial nitrogen supply (EMNS, of g/kg of OM digested in the rumen (OMDR) = ((MCP (g/d)×1,000)/DOMR (g)) assuming that rumen digestion = 65% of digestion in total tract.