Table 4.
Ca (%) | nPP (%) | Ca/nP,P | Tibia ash* (%) | Tibia P*(%) | Tibia Ca*(%) | Tibia breaking strength (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.60 | 0.27 | 2.22 | 46.69b | 8.22b | 16.14b | 79.08b |
0.60 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 49.47c | 8.88c | 16.96b | 89.21b |
1.10 | 0.27 | 4.07 | 37.22a | 6.12a | 13.08a | 54.86a |
1.10 | 0.50 | 2.20 | 51.31d | 9.12c | 18.20c | 115.27c |
SEM | 0.253 | 0.06 | 0.222 | 2.648 | ||
Main effects | ||||||
Ca levels | ||||||
0.60 | 48.08 | 8.55 | 16.55 | 84.14 | ||
1.10 | 44.26 | 7.62 | 15.64 | 85.07 | ||
nPP levels | ||||||
0.27 | 41.96 | 7.17 | 14.61 | 66.97 | ||
0.50 | 50.39 | 9.00 | 17.58 | 102.24 | ||
Source of variation | ———p-value——— | |||||
Ca levels | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.059 | 0.864 | ||
nPP levels | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Ca levels×nPP levels | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Within comparisons, means in a column with no common superscripts differ significantly (p≤0.05). n = 6.
Results were expressed on dry-defatted weight basis of tibia.