Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;25(10):1351–1356. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12162

Table 1.

Number of animals or litters of four different breed types weighed at two locations in three outdoor trials*

Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Total
CEFS NCA&T CEFS NCA&T CEFS NCA&T
BY IBW - - - 61 - 41 102
LBW - - - 8 - 4 12
IWW - 28 25 42 42 36 173
LWW - 7 5 8 6 4 30
BWM - 28 25 28 24 - 105
BWF - - - 28 - 23 51
LBY IBW - - - 53 - - 53
LBW - - - 7 - - 7
IWW - 26 21 28 - - 75
LWW - 4 2 6 - - 12
BWM - 26 21 28 - - 75
BWF - - - 27 - - 27
TY IBW - - - - - 39 39
LBW - - - - - 4 4
IWW - - - - 16 19 35
LWW - - - - 2 3 5
BWM - - - - 16 - 16
BWF - - - - - 12 12
YY IBW - - - 59 - 30 89
LBW - - - 6 - 3 9
IWW - 29 22 35 33 21 140
LWW - 7 4 6 5 3 25
BWM - 29 22 7 25 - 83
BWF - - - 7 - 8 15
Total IBW - - - 173 - 110 283
LBW - - - 21 - 11 32
IWW - 83 68 105 91 76 423
LWW - 18 11 20 13 10 72
BWM - 83 68 63 65 - 279
BWF - - - 63 - 43 106
*

Weights collected included: IBW = Individual birth weight; LBW = Litter birth weight; IWW = Individual weaning weight; LWW = Litter weaning weight; BWM = Body weight collected manually; BWF = Body weight collected by a FIRE system. Locations were the Cherry Research Farm, Center for Environmental Farming System (CEFS) alternative swine unit and North Carolina A&T State University (NCA&T) farm. Breed types were Berkshire×Yorkshire (BY); Large Black×Yorkshire (LBY); Tamworth×Yorkshire (TY) and Yorkshire×Yorkshire (YY).