Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;27(6):767–777. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13541

Table 4.

Construction material for chicken houses, housing equipment and feeding system used by 163 smallholder farmers across six agro-ecological zones of Oman1

Variable Agro-ecological zone2 Mean

MU
n = 30
BT
n = 30
NH
n = 30
EH
n = 28
EC
n = 25
DF
n = 20
Construction material
 Wooden and iron sheet 50.1 50.7 66.7 67.8 92.0 69.2 66.1
 Concrete/mud 29.9 39.4 23.3 21.4 4.0 20.4 23.1
 Palm leaves and fences 20.0 9.9 10.0 10.8 4.0 10.4 10.9
Existence of management assets
 Brooding lamp 20.0 26.7 16.2 25.0 0.0 75.0 27.2
 Laying nests 43.3 53.3 43.3 28.6 8.7 39.8 36.1
 Air circulation fans 8.0 10.0 10.1 7.1 0.0 5.2 6.7
 Approved feeders and water troughs 36.6 71.9 58.0 22.2 20.3 75.9 47.5
Feeding system
 Scavenging only 33.5 26.7 33.3 47.1 53.5 55.0 41.5
 Use of commercial supplements 66.5 73.3 66.7 52.9 46.5 45.0 58.5
1

All values are percentages of use by farmers in the different zones and across the zones (last column). Sums of percentages per category can deviate from 100.

2

Agro-ecological zone: Musandam (MU), Batinah (BT), North Hajar (NH), East Hajar (EH), East Coast (EC), Dhofar (DF).