Skip to main content
. 2014 May;27(5):726–732. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13654

Table 2.

Effect of housing systems and Se, Zn, and vitamin E supplementation on results of fattening and the carcass quality of lamb

Item Group1 SEM2 p-value3


C S G C vs S C vs G
Body weight, start (kg) 14.1 14.2 14.2 0.59 0.945 0.916
Body weight, final (kg) 27.5 28.4 23.7 0.71 0.463 0.002
ADG during fattening (g/d) 223 237 159 10.8 0.331 0.002
Half carcass weight (kg) 5.9 6.19 4.33 0.22 0.308 0.000
Pelvic limb deepness (cm) 20.4 20.2 18.5 0.29 0.949 0.000
Pelvic limb tightness index (%) 145.1 145.9 126.7 1.17 0.816 0.000
Pelvic limb weight (g) 1,990 2,111 1,514 328 0.208 0.000
Loin - rib weight (g) 851 896 554 8.59 0.878 0.000
Anterior - rib weight (g) 439 472 319 9.18 0.155 0.000
Valuable cuts (g) 3,280 3,478 2387 48.5 0.197 0.000
Content of valuable cuts (%) 55.7 56.2 55.2 0.13 0.345 0.133
Thorasic limb wright (g) 1,089 1,139 852 166 0.337 0.000
Neck weight (g) 477 479 374 13.24 0.942 0.000
Breast weight (g) 946 988 657 19.6 0.427 0.000
Loin eye area (cm2) 11.45 11.84 8.85 0.22 0.432 0.000
Fat over the eye loin (mm) 1.37 1.57 1.11 0.01 0.398 0.164
Kidney with perirenal fat (g) 111 120 69 2.73 0.288 0.000
Meat in pelvic limb (%) 77.2 77.1 78.5 0.30 0.848 0.079
Fat in pelvic limb (%) 9.6 9.9 6.2 0.29 0.637 0.000
Bones in pelvic limb (%) 13.2 13.0 15.2 0.22 0.658 0.000
1

Group C = Indoor with no supplement, n = 19; S = Indoor with supplement, n = 23; G = Outdoor with no supplement, n = 30.

2

Standard error of the mean.

3

Supplementation effect C vs S and the housing effect C vs G.