Table 4.
CC1
|
CR
|
SEM | Significance2
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCM | HCM | LCM | HCM | CS | CM | I | |||
Ruminal pH | 0 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 0.13 | ns | ns | ns |
h-post feeding | 4 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 0.06 | ns | ns | ns |
mean | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 0.05 | ns | ns | ns | |
NH3-N, mg/dl | 0 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 0.61 | ns | ns | ns |
h-post feeding | 4 | 8.4 | 10.2 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 0.99 | ns | ns | ns |
mean | 7.8 | 8.5 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 0.45 | ns | ns | ns | |
BUN, mg/dl | 0 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 0.20 | ns | ns | ns |
h-post feeding | 4 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 7.8 | 9.3 | 0.80 | * | ns | ns |
mean | 8.7 | 9.4 | 7.3 | 8.2 | 1.00 | * | ns | ns |
CC = Cassava chip, CR3:1= Cassava chip+rice bran 3:1, LCM = Low cotton seed meal, HCM = High cotton seed meal.
CS = Energy sources, CM = Cotton seed meal levels, I = ES×CM interaction.
p<0.05, ns = Non-significant difference, SEM = Standard error of the means.