Table 10.
Treatments mg/kg | CuSO4 | Cu(HMTBa)2 | SEM | p-value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||
4 | 160 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 160 | Treatment | Linear | Quadratic | ||
Carcass wt. (kg) | 88.13b | 88.24b | 88.13b | 88.13b | 90.57a | 89.43ab | 0.51 | <0.01 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
Back fat (mm) | 17.91 | 18.29 | 17.81 | 18.11 | 17.88 | 18.36 | 0.30 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 0.80 |
Yield (%) | 74.62 | 74.92 | 75.16 | 73.78 | 74.77 | 74.73 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
Lean (%) | 54.63 | 54.33 | 54.72 | 54.64 | 54.93 | 54.56 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
Loin depth (mm) | 55.73c | 55.19c | 55.96bc | 56.64abc | 58.12a | 58.12ab | 0.58 | <0.01 | 0.04 | 0.11 |
Means in a row with no common superscripts significantly differ (p<0.05).
There were 8 replicates per treatment with 20–22 pigs per pen. All pigs were marketed at the same day.