Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;27(7):965–973. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13416

Table 5.

Effects of Cu(HMTBa)2 and CuSO4 on performance in Exp. 11

NRC control
CuSO4, (6 mg/kg)
CuSO4
170 mg/kg
Cu(HMTBa)2
170 mg/kg
SEM p-value
Pig body weight (kg)
 d 0 7.36 7.36 7.35 0.10 0.99
 d 14 10.44 10.54 11.27 0.24 0.06
 d 42 22.07b 22.07b 23.40a 0.37 0.03
d 0 to 14
 ADG (g) 220b 227b 279a 12 <0.01
 ADFI (g) 310b 324b 352a 9 0.01
 Gain:feed 0.709a 0.701 a 0.793b 0.026 0.05
d 15 to 42
 ADG (g) 408 405 393 12 0.17
 ADFI (g) 644 601 608 16 0.17
 Gain:feed 0.633 0.674 0.646 0.017 0.31
d 0 to 42
 ADG (g) 346b 346b 378a 7 0.01
 ADFI (g) 537 510 544 10 0.09
 Gain:Feed 0.644 0.678 0.695 0.013 0.06
a,b

Means in a row with no common superscripts significantly differ (p<0.05).

1

Values represent the means of 8 pens with 10 pigs per pen.