Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8424–8448. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8424

Table 3.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided necrosectomy

Ref. Design Cases Technical success Clinical success Recurrence Complications1
Seewald et al[70] RS 13 100% 85% 15% 30%
Charnley et al[71] RS 13 100% 92% 0% None
Voermans et al[72] RS 25 100% 93% 7% 40%
Hocke et al[73] RS 30 97% 83% 3% 23%
Schrover et al[74] RS 8 100 % 75% 12% 25%
Mathew et al[75] RS 6 100% 100% 0% None
Escourrou et al[76] RS 13 100% 100% 0% 46%
Jürgensen et al[77] RS 35 100% 97% 0% 17%
Bakker et al[78] RCT 10 100% 100% 20% 40%
Will et al[79] RS 18 100% 100% 11% 17%
Rische et al[61] RS 22 100% 86% 14% 36%
Yamamoto et al[80] RS 4 100% 50% NR 25%
Hritz et al[81] RS 4 100% 100% 0% None
Yasuda et al[82] RS 57 100% 75% 7% 33%
Ang et al[83] RS 8 100% 87% 13% None
Sarkaria et al[84] RS 17 100% 88% 0% 6%
Total 16 studies 283 100% (97%-100%) 88% (50%-100%) 7% (0%-20%) 28% (0%-46%)
1

Complications include: early and late, procedural and stent related. RCT: Randomized controlled trial; PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; NR: Not reported.