Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8424–8448. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8424

Table 7.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of non-peripancreatic and pelvic collections

Ref. Design Cases Technical success Clinical success Complications1
Attwell et al[135] CR 1 100% 100% None
Giovannini et al[136] PS 12 100% 75% 25%
Seewald et al[137] CR 2 100% 100% None
Seewald et al[138] CR 1 100% 100% None
Kahaleh et al[139] CR 2 100% 100% None
Lee et al[140] CR 1 100% 100% None
Jah et al[141] CR 1 100% 100% None
Shami et al[142] RS 5 100% 100% None
Ang et al[143] CR 1 100% 100% None
Piraka et al[144] PS 7 100% 100% 28%
Noh et al[145] PS 3 100% 100% None
Puri et al[146] RS 14 100% 93% None
Itoi et al[147] CR 1 100% 100% None
Decker et al[148] CR 1 100% 100% None
Gupta et al[149] RS 20 90% 90% 35%
Ulla-Rocha et al[150] RS 6 100% 100% None
Varadarajulu et al[151] CR 1 100% 100% None
Knuth et al[152] CR 1 100% 100% None
Ramesh et al[153] RS 38 100% 87% None
Luigiano et al[154] CR 2 100% 100% None
Total 20 studies 120 100% (90%-100%) 100% (75%-100%) 0% (0%-35%)
1

Complications include: early and late, procedural and stent related. PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; CR: Case report.