Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8482–8490. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8482

Table 2.

Characteristics of the identified studies

Ref. Age median, yr (range) Sex m/tot n (%) hENT1 method Chemotherapy Radiation dose Gy/(Gy/frac) Outcome measurement Quality REMARK
Spratlin et al[9] 58 (51-64)1 11 (52) IHC Pall Gem No OS 10
Giovannetti et al[10] 65 (22-83) 53 (50) RT-PCR Pall Gem Adj Gem 45 OS, DFS, TTP, RR 12
Farrell et al[12] 53/63/652 45 (49) IHC Adj Gem 50.4 OS, DFS, Tox 17
Maréchal et al[3] 56 (34-83) 23 (51) IHC Adj Gem 40-50.4 OS, DFS, Tox 13
Fujita et al[8] 65 (36-86) 42 (60) RT-PCR Adj Gem or Resection only No OS, DFS 12
Maréchal et al[1] NR 129 (53) IHC Adj Gem 50.4 OS 15
Kawada et al[2] - (41-81) 33 (52) IHC Neo Gem Adj 5-FU 50/2 DSS 9
Morinaga et al[21] 64 (45-74) 17 (63) IHC Adj Gem No OS, DFS 12
Murata et al[22] 68 (44-87) 38 (69) IHC Neo Gem Adj Gem 45/2 OS, DFS, RR 13
Nakagawa et al[23] 67 (41-83) 52 (48) IHC Adj Gem + S1 No OS, DFS 13
1

95%CI;

2

Medians in the different hENT1 expression groups. IHC: Immunohistochemistry; RT-PCR: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; Adj: Adjuvant; Neo: Neoadjuvant; Radio: Radiotherapy; Gem: Gemcitabine; Pall: Palliative; OS: Overall survival; DFS: Disease-free survival; Tox: Toxicity; TTP: Time to progression; DSS: Disease-specific survival; RR: Response rate.