Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;20(26):8624–8630. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8624

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of 15 endoscopic submucosal dissection and 31 endoscopic mucosal resection performed in 44 patients n (%)

Total ESD (n = 15) EMR (n = 31) P value
Age, yr, mean ± SD (range) 65 ± 9 (35-79) 68 ± 5 (57-79) 64 ± 10 (35-77) 0.0775
Male/female 24/22 6/9 18/13 0.3480
Location in duodenum 0.0457
Bulb 15 (32.6) 8 (53.3) 7 (22.6)
Second portion 31 (67.4) 7 (46.7) 24 (77.4)
Size, mm, mean ± SD (range) 11.9 ± 9.7 (3-60) 12.9 ± 14.3 (3-60) 11.4 ± 6.7 (4-25) 0.6474
≥ 20 mm 8 (17.4) 2 (13.3) 6 (19.4)
< 20 mm 38 (82.6) 13 (86.7) 25 (80.6)
Macroscopic type 0.0009
Protruded 9 (19.6) 0 9 (29.0)
Elevated 21 (45.6) 4 (26.7) 17 (54.8)
Depressed 7 (15.2) 4 (26.7) 3 (9.7)
SMT 9 (19.6) 7 (46.6) 2 (6.5)
Histology 0.0044
Adenocarcinoma 6 (13.0) 2 (13.3) 4 (12.9)
Adenoma 31 (67.4) 6 (40.0) 25 (80.6)
NET 9 (19.6) 7 (46.7) 2 (6.5)

ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; SMT: Submucosal tumor; NET: Neuroendocrine tumor.