Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2013 Nov 25;26(1):115–126. doi: 10.1037/a0034858

Table 2.

Tests of Measurement Invariance and Population Heterogeneity of ACSS in Males and Females (Sample 3)

χ2 df MLR Scaling Factor YB χ2diff Δdf CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR
Single Group Solutions
  Male 62.86 14 1.15 -- -- .90 .85 .10 (.08, .13) .05
  Female 34.78 14 1.17 -- -- .97 .96 .06 (.04, .09) .03
Measurement Equivalence
  Equal form 100.19 28 1.13 -- -- .94 .91 .09 (.07, .10) .04
  Equal factor loadings 108.10 34 1.13 7.96 6 .94 .92 .08 (.06, .10) .05
  Equal indicator intercepts 135.64 40 1.11 28.47* 6 .92 .91 .08 (.07, .10) .06
Partial Measurement Equivalence
  Equal indicator intercepts 114.40 39 1.12 5.23 5 .94 .93 .07 (.06, .09) .05
Population Heterogeneity
  Equal Latent Means 138.73 40 1.112 32.67* 1 .92 .91 .08 (.07, .10) .08

Note. χ2 = Chi-Square; df = degrees of freedom; MLR Scaling Factor = Robust Maximum Likelihood Scaling Factor; YB χ2= Yuan-Bentler Scaled Chi-Square; SRMR = Standardized Root Mean Residual; CFI = Comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation;

*

p<.05.