TABLE 4.
Association between SSB intake and abdominal adiposity in 2596 adults1
| Non-consumers |
Consumers |
P-interaction |
||||||
| 0 to <1/mo | ≥1/mo to <1/wk | ≥1/wk to <1/d | ≥1/d | P-trend | SSB × Sex | SSB × BMI | SSB × Age | |
| Median consumption, servings/wk | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10 | ||||
| Participants, n | 851 | 910 | 482 | 353 | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | 27.8 (27.4, 28.1) | 27.2 (26.9, 27.5) | 27.5 (27.1, 27.9) | 26.9 (26.3, 27.4) | 0.05 | |||
| Waist circumference,2 cm | ||||||||
| Model 1 | 95.9 (95.0, 96.8) | 94.2 (93.4, 95.0) | 95.7 (94.5, 96.8) | 94.2 (92.8, 95.5) | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.67 |
| VAT, cm3 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | 1700 (1640, 1750) | 1660 (1610, 1720) | 1830 (1760, 1910) | 1740 (1650, 1820) | 0.11 | |||
| Model 1 + SAT | 1640 (1600, 1690) | 1700 (1660, 1740) | 1830 (1770, 1880) | 1800 (1730, 1870) | <0.001 | 0.53 | 0.08 | 0.78 |
| SAT, cm3 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | 2990 (2900, 3090) | 2750 (2660, 2830) | 2850 (2730, 2970) | 2670 (2520, 2820) | 0.02 | |||
| Model 1 + VAT | 3010 (2940, 3080) | 2800 (2730, 2870) | 2730 (2640, 2820) | 2650 (2540, 2770) | <0.001 | 0.94 | <0.001 | 0.65 |
| VAT:SAT ratio2 | ||||||||
| Model 1 | 0.54 (0.52, 0.55) | 0.56 (0.55, 0.58) | 0.60 (0.58, 0.62) | 0.62 (0.59, 0.64) | <0.001 | 0.83 | 0.15 | 0.28 |
1
Data are presented as means or geometric means and 95% CIs. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, energy intake, alcohol intake, diet soda intake, modified DGAI, educational level, physical activity level, smoking status, and Framingham cohort. DGAI, 2005 Dietary Guideline Adherence Index; SAT, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
2
Geometric means.