Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2012 Oct 3;162(3):562–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.08.038

Table.

Comparison of patients with 6-month prepubertal versus pubertal US LH at baseline and 12 months

All patients at baseline (n = 33) Prepubertal LH at baseline (n = 12) Pubertal LH at baseline (n = 17) All patients at 12 months (n = 32) Prepubertal LH at 12 months (n = 12) Pubertal LH at 12 months (n = 17)
Sex, n (%) M: 7 (21)
F: 26 (79)
M: 2 (17)
F: 10 (83)
M: 5 (29)
F: 12 (71)
Age at implantation, years, mean ± SD 7.2 ± 2.5 7.4 ± 2.6 7.0 ± 2.4
Previous GnRHa therapy, n (%) 12 (39) 5 (42) 5 (29)
CNS abnormality on imaging, n (%) 4 (13) 3 (25) 1 (6)
BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD 18.3 ± 3.8 19.6 ± 4.6 17.3 ± 3.0 19.7 ± 5.1 21.6 ± 6.2 18.6 ± 3.8
Growth velocity, cm/year, mean ± SD 5.8 ± 2.4 5.8 ± 2.4 5.6 ± 2.3
Growth velocity SDS, mean ± SD −0.41 ± 2.7 −0.43 ± 3.2 −0.46 ± 2.4
BA/CA, mean ± SD 1.31 ± 0.24 1.35 ± 0.19 1.31 ± 0.26 1.25 ± 0.22 1.22 ± 0.17 1.28 ± 0.27
Tanner breast staging, n II: 1/26
III: 19/26
IV: 6/26
III: 9/10
IV: 1/10
II: 1/12
III: 7/12
IV: 4/12
I: 1/25
II: 1/25
III: 19/25
IV: 1/25
V: 3/25
II: 1/10
III: 8/10
V: 1/10
I: 1/12
III: 8/12
IV: 1/12
V: 2/12
Testicular volume, mL 4–15 (n = 7) 4, 10 (n = 2) 5, 10, 12, 12, 15 (n = 5) 5–10 (n = 7) 5, 7 (n = 2) 5, 8, 8, 9, 9 (n = 5)
Menarche 2 (8) 0 (0) 2 (16) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

BA/CA, bone age to chronological age ratio; BMI, body mass index; CNS, central nervous system.

P value not significant for all comparisons between patients with prepubertal and pubertal US LH values.