Table 4.
No. |
Age median (95% CI) |
HIV prevalence (95% CI) |
Migration prevalence a | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Isixhosa |
1980 |
29.7 (29.2-30.2) |
16.4 (13.4-19.9) |
8.1 (6.5-10.2) |
Isizulu |
2071 |
30.2 (29.8-30.8) |
24.4 (21.4-27.8) |
10.6 (8.4-13.3) |
Sesotho |
915 |
31.1 (30.3-31.80 |
23.8 (18.7-29.3) |
11.6 (8.9-14.9) |
Sepedi |
891 |
29.7 (28.9-30.4) |
13.4 (10.6-17.4) |
15.0 (11.5-19.3) |
Setswana |
1023 |
34.6 (33.9-35.3) |
15.0 (11.2-19.6) |
13.9 (11.5-16.6) |
White |
1402 |
34.6 (33.9-35.3) |
0.5 (0.2-1.0) |
10.3 (8.0-13.1) |
Coloured |
2633 |
31.3 (30.9-31.8) |
3.0 (2.1-4.2) |
8.2 (6.6-10.2) |
Indian |
1465 |
32.7 (32.1-33.4) |
1.0 (0.3-2.4) |
6.7 (5.1-8.8) |
Beta-coefficient
b
|
|
|
- |
1.452 |
R
2b
|
|
|
- |
0.18 |
P b | - | 0.284 |
aMigration prevalence defined as the percentage of the ethnic group that spent a period of one month or more living in a different province to their current province in the previous 12 months.
bThe Beta coefficient, R2 and P rows represent the univariate regression analyses of the relationship between migration prevalence and HIV prevalence by ethnic group.