Table 4.
Linkage disequilibrium
| |
|
1
All samples |
Unique haplotypes |
Reduction in
I
A
S
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Year | N | I A S | P-value | N | I A S | P-value | Fold change |
|
Anhui |
2007-10 |
84 |
0.261 |
P < 0.001 |
41 |
0.092 |
P < 0.001 |
2.8 |
|
Jiangsu |
2008-10 |
17 |
0.404 |
P < 0.001 |
11 |
0.209 |
P < 0.001 |
1.9 |
|
Central China |
2008 |
43 |
0.230 |
P < 0.001 |
25 |
0.054 |
P < 0.001 |
4.3 |
| |
2009 |
34 |
0.273 |
P < 0.001 |
20 |
0.151 |
P < 0.001 |
1.8 |
| |
2010 |
19 |
0.322 |
P < 0.001 |
15 |
0.112 |
P < 0.001 |
2.9 |
| Central China | 2007-10 | 101 | 0.254 | P < 0.001 | 46 | 0.093 | P < 0.001 | 2.7 |
1All samples with no missing data at 6 loci (excluding MS10).