Table 2.
Presented here, a comparison of studies where general linear model-based fMRI analysis was used to analyze error processing in healthy adults performing a simple Go/NoGo task. The sample size, baseline, and regions engaged during error processing across these eight fMRI studies employing a simple Go/NoGo task are presented.
| FRONTAL | TEMPORAL | PARIETAL | OCCIPITAL | SUBCORTICAL | CEREBELLAR | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication | Sample Size |
Baseline | ACC | Cingulate Gy |
Sup Front Gy |
Med Front Gy |
Inf Front Gy |
Precen Gy |
Sup Temp Gy |
Mid Temp Gy |
Trans Temp Gy |
Insula | Inf Par Lobe |
Post- cent Gy |
Supra- mar Gy |
Post Cing |
Precun | Inf Occ Gy |
Mid Occ Gy |
Cuneus | Fusi- form Gy |
Sub- thal Nuc |
Pons | Mid Brain |
Mam- mil Body |
Cerebellum |
| Errors of Commission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current (p < .05) | 102 | CR & Hits | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Magno et al., 2006 (p < .05) [80] | 19 | CR | x | x | x | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Hester et al., 2005 (p < .05) [81] | 15 | Unaware FA | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||||||||||||||
| Garavan et al., 2003 (p < .01) [16] | 16 | CR | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mathalon et al., 2003 (p < .05) [10] | 10 | Hits | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||||||||
| Garavan et al., 2002 (p < .05) [8] | 14 | CR | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||
| Menon et al., 2001 (p < .05) [12] | 14 | CR | x | x | x | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Kiehl et al., 2000 (p < .05) [15] | 14 | Implicit & CR | x | x | ||||||||||||||||||||||