Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2014 Apr 12;268:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.001

Table 4.

Summary of the t-scores and the seven regions of interest extracted from a traditional hemodynamic response analysis of correct rejections vs. false alarms for the total sample (n = 102). Using the hemodynamic variants, all regions identified in the traditional contrast exhibited a positive hemodynamic response of correct rejections relative to a smaller positive response to false alarms. Eta squared is also presented as an account for BOLD signal variance assumed within each ROI.

Location t-score X y z BA η2
Frontal Lobe
1 R Subgenual Cingulate 4.28 ** 12 12 −12 25 .16
2 L Subgenual Cingulate 4.11 ** −12 15 −15 25 .15
Parietal Lobe
3 R Inferior Parietal Lobule 4.04 * 33 −54 48 40 .14
4 R Precuneus 5.75 *** 30 −75 54 7 .24
Occipital Lobe
5 R Middle Occipital Gyrus 5.27 *** 33 −96 0 18 .22
6 L Middle Occipital Gyrus 5.03 ** −30 −99 0 18 .21
Subcortical
7 R Putamen 4.20 ** 24 6 −3 NA .15
*

p .05;

**

p .01;

***

p .001 corrected for multiple comparisons.