Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):300–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.002

Table 5.

Predicted mean costs and incremental effects of predictors

Patient type Group Predicted Mean costs ($) Incremental cost per PFD compared to SMT 0 ($) Incremental cost per DFD compared to SMT 0 ($) Incremental Cost($) of Dose change to Incremental Costs ($) due the following:
SMT 6 SMT 12 SMT 18 Smoking 14-year (1 SD) increase in age 22-point (1 SD) increase in baseline disability score $30 (1 SD) increase in treatment costs in the 14 days preceding enrollment $600 (1 SD) increase in treatment and lost productivity costs in the 14 days preceding enrollment
Annual cost of treatment
Profile M* SMT 0 596 N.A. N.A. 317 123 345 123 34 192 119 N.A.
Profile M* SMT 6 914 19 25 N.A. −194 28 161 44 251 156 N.A.
Profile M* SMT 12 720 5 6 N.A. 222 107 29 167 104 N.A.
Profile M* SMT 18 941 19 28 N.A. 110 30 173 107 N.A.
Profile L SMT 0 61 N.A. N.A. 154 195 401 12 3 20 47 N.A.
Profile L SMT 6 215 9 12 N.A. 41 246 16 4 25 61 N.A.
Profile L SMT 12 255 9 10 N.A. 206 11 3 17 41 N.A.
Profile L SMT 18 461 22 33 N.A. 11 3 18 42 N.A.
Profile H SMT 0 3,551 N.A. N.A. 1,217 −271 39 733 202 1,147 487 N.A.
Profile H SMT 6 4,768 72 95 N.A. −1,488 −1,178 956 263 1,496 635 N.A.
Profile H SMT 12 3,280 −12 −14 N.A. 310 635 175 994 422 N.A.
Profile H SMT 18 3,590 2 3 N.A. 657 181 1,028 436 N.A.
Annual cost of treatment and lost productivity
Profile M* SMT 0 3,492 N.A. N.A. 734 94 476 536 764 1,601 N.A. 825
Profile M* SMT 6 4,226 44 57 N.A. −640 −258 627 894 1,875 N.A. 966
Profile M* SMT 12 3,586 4 5 N.A. 381 519 740 1,551 N.A. 799
Profile M* SMT 18 3,968 26 39 N.A. 546 779 1,632 N.A. 841
Profile L SMT 0 1,637 N.A. N.A. 416 152 439 251 358 750 N.A. 387
Profile L SMT 6 2,053 25 33 N.A. −264 23 294 419 879 N.A. 453
Profile L SMT 12 1,789 7 8 N.A. 287 243 347 727 N.A. 375
Profile L SMT 18 2,076 24 36 N.A. 256 365 765 N.A. 394
Profile H SMT 0 15,422 N.A. N.A. 2,777 −277 710 2,366 3,373 7,071 N.A. 3,643
Profile H SMT 6 18,200 165 217 N.A. −3,055 −2,067 2,771 3,951 8,282 N.A. 4,267
Profile H SMT 12 15,145 −12 −14 N.A. 988 2,292 3,268 6,851 N.A. 3,530
Profile H SMT 18 16,133 39 58 N.A. 2,412 3,439 7,210 N.A. 3,715

N.A.-- Not Applicable: retransformed profiles include additive cost of study treatment.

*

Profile M (patient characteristics reflective of the mean) — 41 year-old, college-educated, non-white or Hispanic, unmarried, non-smoking female with no previous massage or chiropractic treatment, differential treatment confidence score 0, and baseline pain, disability and QALY scores of 51, 45, and 0.76, respectively. She had treatment costs of $35, and treatment plus lost productivity costs of $600 in the 4 wks preceding study enrollment.

Profile L (variables one standard deviation away from mean predicted to lower costs) — 27 year-old, non-white or Hispanic, unmarried, low-income, non-smoking male with no previous massage or chiropractic treatment, differential treatment confidence score 0, and baseline pain, disability and QALY scores of 60, 30, and 0.85, respectively. He had treatment costs of $5, and treatment plus lost productivity costs of $200 in the 4 wks preceding study enrollment.

Profile H (variables one standard deviation away mean predicted to raise costs) --55 year-old, college-educated, white non-Hispanic, married, non-smoking female with prior massage and chiropractic treatment, differential treatment confidence score 1, and baseline pain, disability and QALY scores of 40, 55, and 0.65, respectively. She had treatment costs of $55 and treatment plus lost productivity costs of $1200 in the 4 wks preceding study enrollment.