Table 7.
MCI/NC classification comparison with iMSF and Ingalhalikar’s algorithm. (Please refer to Table 6 for detailed descriptions of this Table.)
| Framework | Methods | Performance measures |
t-test on AUC (p-value) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acc | Sen | Spe | AUC | with rEM | with mFPC | ||
| Proposed | rEM | 0.701 ± 0.047 | 0.866 | 0.414 | 0.774 | ||
| mFPC | 0.715 ± 0.056 | 0.753 | 0.649 | 0.773 | |||
| iMSF | regression | 0.692 ± 0.063 | 0.649 | 0.768 | 0.760 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| logistic | 0.706 ± 0.051 | 0.818 | 0.509 | 0.733 | < 0.0005* | < 0.0005* | |
| Ingalhalikar’s | fusion1 | 0.642 ± 0.062 | 0.644 | 0.639 | 0.664 | < 0.0005* | < 0.0005* |
| fusion2 | 0.649 ± 0.063 | 0.651 | 0.643 | 0.689 | < 0.0005* | < 0.0005* | |