Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 27;91:386–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.033

Table 7.

MCI/NC classification comparison with iMSF and Ingalhalikar’s algorithm. (Please refer to Table 6 for detailed descriptions of this Table.)

Framework Methods Performance measures
t-test on AUC (p-value)
Acc Sen Spe AUC with rEM with mFPC
Proposed rEM 0.701 ± 0.047 0.866 0.414 0.774
mFPC 0.715 ± 0.056 0.753 0.649 0.773

iMSF regression 0.692 ± 0.063 0.649 0.768 0.760 0.001 0.001
logistic 0.706 ± 0.051 0.818 0.509 0.733 < 0.0005* < 0.0005*

Ingalhalikar’s fusion1 0.642 ± 0.062 0.644 0.639 0.664 < 0.0005* < 0.0005*
fusion2 0.649 ± 0.063 0.651 0.643 0.689 < 0.0005* < 0.0005*