Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Nov 8;50(3):337–346. doi: 10.1597/12-104

Table 4.

Association Between Cumulative Maternal Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and the Risk of Any Oral Clefts in Offspring, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2002.

Cumulative Exposure Level (ug/m3–hours)A Controls n Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate Cases n Cleft Palate OR (95% CI)
Cases n OR (95% CI)
Crude Analysis ptrend = 0.01 ptrend = 0.55
 No PAH exposure 0 2883 758 1.00 (ref) 419 1.00 (ref)
 Low PAH exposure 0.32–100 55 21 1.45 (0.87, 2.42) 11 1.38 (0.71, 2.65)
 High PAH exposure 108–6900 51 26 1.94 (1.20, 3.13) 9 1.21 (0.59, 2.48)
Adjusted AnalysisB ptrend = 0.02 ptrend = 0.47
 No PAH exposure 0 2881 757 1.00 (ref) 419 1.00 (ref)
 Low PAH exposure 0.32–100 55 21 1.36 (0.82, 2.27) 11 1.33 (0.69, 2.56)
 High PAH exposure 108–6900 51 26 1.66 (1.02, 2.70) 9 1.15 (0.56, 2.36)
A

Cumulative exposure (unit-hours) was estimated by:(weighted intensity (unit)) x ((self reported work frequency (hours/week))/(7 days/week)) x (number of days worked one month before pregnancy through the third month of pregnancy), reported to two significant figures.

B

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate adjusted for maternal education. Cleft palate adjusted for maternal secondhand smoke exposure at home.