Table 2.
Second review | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Review | Grader 1 | Yes | No | Indeterminate | Total | κ valueb = 0.57 95% CI (0.35, 0.78) |
Yes | 17 | 2 | 0 | 19 | ||
No | 9 | 23 | 0 | 32 | ||
Indeterminate | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
Total | 26 | 26 | 1 | 53 | ||
| ||||||
Grader 2 | Yes | No | Indeterminate | Total | κ value = 0.76 95% CI (0.56, 0.92) |
|
Yes | 21 | 1 | 0 | 22 | ||
No | 6 | 25 | 0 | 31 | ||
Indeterminate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 27 | 26 | 0 | 53 | ||
| ||||||
Grader 3 | Yes | No | Indeterminate | Total | κ value = 0.74 95% CI (0.56, 0.91) |
|
Yes | 20 | 1 | 0 | 21 | ||
No | 5 | 25 | 0 | 30 | ||
Indeterminate | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||
Total | 26 | 27 | 0 | 53 | ||
| ||||||
Consensus | Yes | No | Total | κ value = 0.70 95% CI (0.51, 0.90) |
||
Yes | 21 | 2 | 23 | |||
No | 6 | 24 | 30 | |||
Total | 27 | 26 | 53 |
Agreement testing between first and second review of test-retest MRI sample,
Calculated kappa values are weighted for graders and simple for consensus agreement testing