Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Sep 29;60(6):707–715.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.025

Table 3.

Multivariate model comparing in-hospital mortality of patients experiencing an increased distance to their nearest ED compared with those having no increase in distance

Patients experiencing increased
distance to nearest ED
(n=785,385)

Sample size Odds Ratio
(95% CI)

All time sensitive conditions
Decrease/no change in distance to nearest ED 717,808 (92.0%) ref
Increase in distance to nearest ED 67,577 (8.6%) 1.04 (0.99, 1.09)

AMI (n=162,252)
Decrease/no change in distance to nearest ED 149,273 (92.0%) ref
Increase in distance to nearest ED 12,979 (8.0%) 1.09 (0.94, 1.25)
Stroke (n=191,105)
Decrease/no change in distance to nearest ED 174,989 (91.6%) ref
Increase in distance to nearest ED 16,116 (8.4%) 1.02 (0.95, 1.10)
Sepsis (n=197,357)
Decrease/no change in distance to nearest ED 178,209 (90.3%) ref
Increase in distance to nearest ED 19,148 (9.7%) 1.04 (0.97, 1.11)
Asthma/COPD (n=234,671)
Decrease/no change in distance to nearest ED 215,337 (91.8%) ref
Increase in distance to nearest ED 19,334 (8.2%) 1.08 (0.94, 1.24)
*

models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, gender, insurance, case-mix index, and Elixhauser comorbidities (congestive heart failure, paralysis, neurological disorders, chronic lung disease, diabetes, renal failure, liver disease, metastatic cancer, solid tumor, coagulopathy, obesity, weight loss, fluid & electrolyte disorders, chronic blood loss anemia, deficiency anemia, peripheral vascular disease, alcohol abuse, and depression), year, and zip code level clustering