Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biomed Tech (Berl). 2013 Dec;58(6):565–576. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2012-0062

Table 1.

MPI scan time comparison.

Isotropic gradient strength Native image resolution (Resovist tracer) T2D for 2D projection (FFL) or single slice (FFP) (10 cm)2 T3D,ffp for 3D image (FFP) (10 cm)3 T3D,pr for 3D projection recon image (FFL) (10 cm)3
10 T/m 1 mm 3.6 s 260 s 560 s
5 T/m 2 mm 0.89 s 32 s 70 s
2.5 T/m 4 mm 0.22 s 4.0 s 8.8 s
1.25 T/m 8 mm 0.06 s 0.50 s 1.1 s

Best case imaging times [no partial field of view (pFOV) overlap] for slow field shift limited imaging using the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) limits of Smax = 20 T/s when imaging the human torso with a drive field amplitude of Bth = 7 mT (see Appendix 2), and Resovist tracer. We assume a (10 cm)3 FOV, which would be a reasonable FOV for imaging the human heart. Note that the SNR of a 3D PR image is nearly an order of magnitude better than a 3D image taken using an FFP imager.