. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Feb 28;41(6):1232–1239. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2718-6

Table 3.

LV Dyssynchrony and QRSd in ICM vs. DCM

	Patients with ICM (N=17)	Patients with DCM
	Patients with ICM (N=17)	Entire Group (N=47)	QRSd ≥150 ms (N=26)	QRSd <150 ms (N=21)
PSD (°)	50.6 ± 20.6	40.0 ± 18.3^*	45.4 ± 18.5	33.4 ± 16.2^*
PHB (°)	171.9 ± 83.8	128.2 ± 68.5^*	148.4 ± 72.8	103 .2 ± 54.5^*
QRSd (ms)	144 ± 23	151 ± 16	163 ± 11^*	138 ± 7

Unpaired t test was used compare the ICM patients to the DCM patients as an entire group and as in two sub-groups with wide and moderate QRS durations, respectively.

Statistical significance by the unpaired t test with unequal variance (p<0.05)