Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Dev Psychol. 2014 July-August;35(4):294–303. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.003

Figure 2. Estimated latent means on each PRS clinical index for the Adolescent sample using the original scores and CSS.

Figure 2

Values reflect estimates of the most restricted models (partial invariant models). Latent means of the child group (PRS-C) are fixed to 0. Child group (PRS-C), N = 161, Adolescent group (PRS-A), N = 200. ***p < .001, **p < .01,