Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):404–411. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9976-0

Table 3.

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals from Random-effects Logistic Regression Analysis of Men in Gay Couples Who Had UAI with a Secondary Partner (vs. no UAI with Secondary Partner) by Characteristic

Characteristic OR 95% CI
Type of relationship (Monogamy vs. Open) 0.03* 0.001 – 0.47
Last HIV test (< 3 months vs. > 3 months or none) 0.18* 0.04 – 0.88
Sexual Agreement Investment Scale Commitment 0.22** 0.07 – 0.66
Recruitment city 0.71 0.14 – 3.53

Model n 185 obs., 119 dyads
Log likelihood −47.25
Wald χ2 (p-value) 12.55 (< .01)

Note: Model controlled for recruitment city.

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01