Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):34–41. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130070

Table 3.

Change in the Proportion of Patients* Meeting the Low-Density Lipoprotein Goal as a Function of Key Drivers Implementation Scale (KDIS) Score at Year 1

Key Drivers
KDIS Score Registry Protocol Planned Care Template Self-Management Support All 4 Drivers§
0 0.89 (0.68–1.16) 0.74 (0.60–0.91) 1.20 (0.91–1.59) 1.15 (0.94–1.40) 0.78 (0.59–1.03)
1 0.97 (0.78–1.20) 0.88 (0.75–1.03) 1.13 (0.91–1.40) 1.10 (0.93–1.30) 0.91 (0.74–1.11)
2 1.05 (0.89–1.25) 1.05 (0.89–1.25) 1.05 (0.89–1.25) 1.05 (0.89–1.25) 1.05 (0.89–1.25)
3 1.14 (0.99–1.33) 1.26 (0.98–1.61) 0.98 (0.84–1.15) 1.01 (0.82–1.23) 1.22 (0.99–1.50)
4 1.24 (1.07–1.44) 1.50 (1.07–2.11) 0.92 (0.77–1.10) 0.96 (0.75–1.24) 1.42 (1.07–1.89)
5 1.35 (1.13–1.61) 1.80 (1.16–2.80) 0.86 (0.68–1.08) 0.92 (0.67–1.26) 1.65 (1.13–2.41)

Values are presented as odds ratio (95% confidence intervals). An odds ratio greater than 1 indicates improvement between years 1 and 2. Bold values indicate statistically significant results at P < .05.

*

Proportion at the end of 2 years participation compared to 1 year.

Only 41 practices are included in this analysis because 1 practice did not have low-density lipoprotein data for months 10, 11, or 12; the 1-year time interval actually comprises 13 months of data reporting.

Estimates for individual key drivers are calculated holding the other 3 key driver scores at a value of 2.

§

Indicates model estimates when all key drivers receive the same score (ie, all 3s, all 4s, etc.).