Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e101796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101796

Table 4. Weekly training patterns during different phases throughout the season.

Competition phase
Weekly training patterns Transition phase General preparation phase Specific preparation phase Overall Pre-peaking Peaking Regeneration phase
Total training:
Training time (h.wk−1) 13.9±5.3 17.9±2.5 16.5±2.4 11.6±2.2 13.5±3.1 12.1±2.4 6.1±3.7
Tr. sessions.wk−1 8.1±2.8 10.1±1.0 10.3±1.7 8.3±2.1 8.9±1.9 9.2±2.3 4.3±2.3
Training forms:
Endurance (h.wk−1) 12.7±4.9 16.5±2.6 15.7±2.2 11.2±2.0 12.9±2.8 β 11.7±2.3 5.9±3.6
Strength (h.wk−1) 1.1±1.0 1.2±0.5 0.7±0.4 * 0.3±0.2 0.5±0.4 # 0.2±0.2 0.2±0.3
Sprint (h.wk−1) 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.0±0.0
Intensity distribution:
Zone 1 (h.wk−1) 10.8±4.7 14.3±2.6 13.8±2.1 9.4±2.3 11.2±2.8 β 9.7±2.0 4.9±2.9
Zone 2 (h.wk−1) 1.3±0.9 0.9±0.6 0.6±0.5 * 0.4±0.3 # 0.4±0.5 # 0.6±0.8 0.3±0.5
Zone 3 (h.wk−1) 0.3±0.2 0.6±0.2 0.5±0.2 0.4±0.3 0.4±0.2 # 0.4±0.4 0.2±0.3
Zone 4 (h.wk−1) 0.2±0.2 0.5±0.2 0.4±0.3 0.5±0.3 0.5±0.4 0.7±0.4 β 0.3±0.3
Zone 5 (h.wk−1) 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.4±0.2 * 0.5±0.3 0.4±0.3 0.2±0.3 0.2±0.2
Activity forms:
Specific (h.wk−1) 4.3±3.3 8.1±1.7 13.7±2.3 * 10.3±1.5 12.2±2.6 # 10.8±1.8 # 4.1±3.2
Non-Specific (h.wk−1) 8.5±4.6 8.6±1.5 2.1±1.2 * 1.0±0.6 0.8±0.6 1.0±1.0 1.8±1.5

Values are mean ± SD and represent training hours per week in different phases. A non-parametric Friedman test indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in all variables across the GP, SP and CP (P<.05 level). A pairwise post-hoc test (Wilcoxon Signed Rank) was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the GP, SP or CP, as well as pre-peaking and peaking phases (P<.01 level).

*P<.01, GP vs. SP;

#

P<.01, GP vs. CP, pre-peaking or peaking;

β

P<.01, SP vs. CP, pre-peaking or peaking;

P<.01, pre-peaking vs. peaking.